Revisiting Alpinia cumingii (Zingiberaceae): phylogenetic placement, recircumscription and a description of a new morphologically similar species

Alpinia cumingii was described by Karl Moritz Schumann from the Philippines in 1904. Two remarkably similar species, also from the Philippines, Alpinia penduliflora and Alpinia pendula, were described respectively in 1909 by Henry Nicholas Ridley and 1928 by Eduardo Quisumbing and Elmer Drew Merrill, without any reference to A. cumingii, and placed in different sections of Alpinia. A fourth morphologically similar species was collected in New Guinea during fieldwork in 2008. Using molecular data, we aim to determine the phylogenetic relationships of the four species and integrate morphological data to assess the rank at which these should be recognised. We collected new material close to the three type localities in the Philippines and used these new collections as a basis for an updated morphological description, including the previously undescribed species from New Guinea. Molecular analyses revealed that all four species grouped within the Alpinia eubractea clade both in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and trnK–matK regions with strong support. The undescribed species from New Guinea appeared as a sister taxon to the Philippine species in the ITS tree, whereas using the trnK–matK region, it grouped with Vanoverberghia, both with weak support. We name the species Alpinia oktediensis, referring to the type locality. Our data support A. pendula as a distinct species, whereas A. cumingii and A. penduliflora are considered conspecific. We also report a collection from Karekelong Island, as evidence for a new record of A. cumingii in the flora of Indonesia. We provide provisional conservation assessments for each species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Systematic Botany
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/sb25016
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting Alpinia cumingii (Zingiberaceae): phylogenetic placement, recircumscription and a description of a new morphologically similar species

Thomas Haevermans, John R. Poulsen, Rudolph Valentino A. Docot, Thomas Magun et al.
Australian Systematic Botany
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Revisiting Alpinia cumingii (Zingiberaceae): phylogenetic placement, recircumscription and a description of a new morphologically similar species

Thomas Haevermans, John R. Poulsen, Rudolph Valentino A. Docot, Thomas Magun, Rhaven Angelo R. Matalang, Giolo Jacob T. Albarillo, Ryan Joshua M. David
article en

Abstract

Alpinia cumingii was described by Karl Moritz Schumann from the Philippines in 1904. Two remarkably similar species, also from the Philippines, Alpinia penduliflora and Alpinia pendula, were described respectively in 1909 by Henry Nicholas Ridley and 1928 by Eduardo Quisumbing and Elmer Drew Merrill, without any reference to A. cumingii, and placed in different sections of Alpinia. A fourth morphologically similar species was collected in New Guinea during fieldwork in 2008. Using molecular data, we aim to determine the phylogenetic relationships of the four species and integrate morphological data to assess the rank at which these should be recognised. We collected new material close to the three type localities in the Philippines and used these new collections as a basis for an updated morphological description, including the previously undescribed species from New Guinea. Molecular analyses revealed that all four species grouped within the Alpinia eubractea clade both in the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and trnK–matK regions with strong support. The undescribed species from New Guinea appeared as a sister taxon to the Philippine species in the ITS tree, whereas using the trnK–matK region, it grouped with Vanoverberghia, both with weak support. We name the species Alpinia oktediensis, referring to the type locality. Our data support A. pendula as a distinct species, whereas A. cumingii and A. penduliflora are considered conspecific. We also report a collection from Karekelong Island, as evidence for a new record of A. cumingii in the flora of Indonesia. We provide provisional conservation assessments for each species.

Australian Systematic BotanyVol. 39(5)
Forest Institute (US), Forest Research Institute (IN), Far Eastern University (TH), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (GB), Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité (FR), Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR), Department of Biological Sciences (RU), Royal Botanic Garden Sydney (AU), Department of Biological Sciences (BY)
Carlsbergfondet, International Association for Plant Taxonomy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.