Rethinking violence in a time of monsters

Starting from the idea that we currently live in a time of monsters, and drawing on a range of critical perspectives, this theory note argues that addressing contemporary violence requires first rethinking how violence is conceptualised. It challenges dominant framings of violence that obscure structural and colonial violence or present the current moment as decontextualised from longer histories of harm. To address this, it makes a case for knowing violence from the margins and for attending to the politics of naming violence – asking whose knowledge has shaped dominant understandings and with what consequences. Drawing particularly on feminist, postcolonial, decolonial, and relational scholarship, it conceptualises violence as existing along a continuum across diverse forms, sites and temporalities, while foregrounding the consequences of structural violence that are routinely obscured yet underpin many contemporary crises. In centring a critical-relational understanding of violence, the note proposes that violence must be analysed as relational and co-constituted across contexts. This perspective challenges colonial approaches that obscure structural violence and thereby enable its reproduction – perpetuating cycles of harm and sowing the seeds for future times of monsters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Third World Quarterly
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2026.2734477
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking violence in a time of monsters

Birgit Poopuu
Third World Quarterly
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

Rethinking violence in a time of monsters

Birgit Poopuu
article en

Abstract

Starting from the idea that we currently live in a time of monsters, and drawing on a range of critical perspectives, this theory note argues that addressing contemporary violence requires first rethinking how violence is conceptualised. It challenges dominant framings of violence that obscure structural and colonial violence or present the current moment as decontextualised from longer histories of harm. To address this, it makes a case for knowing violence from the margins and for attending to the politics of naming violence – asking whose knowledge has shaped dominant understandings and with what consequences. Drawing particularly on feminist, postcolonial, decolonial, and relational scholarship, it conceptualises violence as existing along a continuum across diverse forms, sites and temporalities, while foregrounding the consequences of structural violence that are routinely obscured yet underpin many contemporary crises. In centring a critical-relational understanding of violence, the note proposes that violence must be analysed as relational and co-constituted across contexts. This perspective challenges colonial approaches that obscure structural violence and thereby enable its reproduction – perpetuating cycles of harm and sowing the seeds for future times of monsters.

Third World Quarterly
Tallinn University (EE)
European Commission, Research Executive Agency, European Research Executive Agency
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.