FBS26: An Entropy-Based Metric for Assessing Architectural Maturity of UML Class Diagrams

Entropy-based metrics can provide a quantitative representation of the information content of UML models, but their practical usefulness depends on a systematic and reproducible calibration of the parameters used to construct the underlying probability distribution. This paper presents FBS26, an extension of the FBS metric that introduces calibrated weights for UML element kinds while retaining the normalized Shannon entropy formulation. The proposed calibration procedure combines three criteria: avoiding false lack-of-information cases, reducing non-monotonic behavior of the metric, and achieving a pronounced decrease in the metric for balanced diagram series. The criteria are applied according to a predefined lexicographic priority. The approach is evaluated using a controlled series of UML class diagrams and 123 UML class diagrams from four industrial software projects, selected from a repository containing more than 2000 UML diagrams from 18 projects. Architectural maturity labels, assigned independently by an experienced software architect, serve as reference data for examining empirical thresholds for structural information. The results show that systematic weight calibration removes the undesirable behavior observed for the considered FBS16 configurations and provides a more stable basis for comparing UML class diagrams. The industrial analysis further indicates differences in the structural entropy ranges of commonly distinguished diagram categories. FBS26, therefore, provides a quantitative information-content measure that can support expert-based assessment of the architectural maturity of UML class diagrams.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e28101126
Primary Topic
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FBS26: An Entropy-Based Metric for Assessing Architectural Maturity of UML Class Diagrams

Wiktor B. Daszczuk, Stanisław Jerzy Niepostyn
Entropy
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
article

FBS26: An Entropy-Based Metric for Assessing Architectural Maturity of UML Class Diagrams

Wiktor B. Daszczuk, Stanisław Jerzy Niepostyn
article en

Abstract

Entropy-based metrics can provide a quantitative representation of the information content of UML models, but their practical usefulness depends on a systematic and reproducible calibration of the parameters used to construct the underlying probability distribution. This paper presents FBS26, an extension of the FBS metric that introduces calibrated weights for UML element kinds while retaining the normalized Shannon entropy formulation. The proposed calibration procedure combines three criteria: avoiding false lack-of-information cases, reducing non-monotonic behavior of the metric, and achieving a pronounced decrease in the metric for balanced diagram series. The criteria are applied according to a predefined lexicographic priority. The approach is evaluated using a controlled series of UML class diagrams and 123 UML class diagrams from four industrial software projects, selected from a repository containing more than 2000 UML diagrams from 18 projects. Architectural maturity labels, assigned independently by an experienced software architect, serve as reference data for examining empirical thresholds for structural information. The results show that systematic weight calibration removes the undesirable behavior observed for the considered FBS16 configurations and provides a more stable basis for comparing UML class diagrams. The industrial analysis further indicates differences in the structural entropy ranges of commonly distinguished diagram categories. FBS26, therefore, provides a quantitative information-content measure that can support expert-based assessment of the architectural maturity of UML class diagrams.

EntropyVol. 28(10)
Warsaw University of Technology (PL), Institute of Computer Science (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.