Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practices and Supplementary Products among Breast Cancer Patients in Sarawak: Use and Reasons for Nonuse

Backgroud: Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) studies in breast cancer often combine heterogeneous practices and supplementary products, complicating interpretation of prevalence estimates. This study examined recent use of questionnaire-listed T&CM practices and supplementary products among breast cancer patients attending follow-up care in Sarawak, Malaysia, and explored variation in combined use across participant characteristics and reasons for no listed use. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 431 adults attending breast cancer follow-up at Sarawak General Hospital from June 2023 to August 2024. Combined use was defined as reporting at least one listed T&CM practice or supplementary product during the preceding six months. Frequencies and percentages summarised reported practices, products, and reasons for no listed use. Pearson chi-square tests examined differences in combined-use status across participant characteristics. Results: Overall, 298 participants (69.1%) met the combined-use definition. However, only 51 participants (17.1% of combined users; 11.8% of the total sample) reported at least one listed traditional practice. Supplementary products predominated, especially fortified milk or colostrum (182/298, 61.1%) and vitamins or minerals (158/298, 53.0%). Combined-use status differed significantly by age group (p = .033), ethnicity (p = .018), residence (p = .018), and educational attainment (p = .048), but not household income, employment status, or cancer stage. Among 133 participants reporting no listed use, 99 (74.4%) had not considered T&CM. Conclusion: The high combined-use estimate was driven mainly by supplementary products rather than traditional therapeutic practices. Distinguishing practices from products provides a more meaningful account of patient behaviour and supports more precise, nonjudgmental oncology follow-up discussions. Future research should examine product formulation, dose, purpose, disclosure, expenditure, and timing in relation to cancer treatment within culturally diverse cancer care settings such as Sarawak.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v15-i4/29095
Primary Topic
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practices and Supplementary Products among Breast Cancer Patients in Sarawak: Use and Reasons for Nonuse

Jerome Kueh, Shirly Siew-Ling Wong, Keng-Sheng Chew, Shee Ling Yap
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
article

Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practices and Supplementary Products among Breast Cancer Patients in Sarawak: Use and Reasons for Nonuse

Jerome Kueh, Shirly Siew-Ling Wong, Keng-Sheng Chew, Shee Ling Yap
article en

Abstract

Backgroud: Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM) studies in breast cancer often combine heterogeneous practices and supplementary products, complicating interpretation of prevalence estimates. This study examined recent use of questionnaire-listed T&CM practices and supplementary products among breast cancer patients attending follow-up care in Sarawak, Malaysia, and explored variation in combined use across participant characteristics and reasons for no listed use. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted among 431 adults attending breast cancer follow-up at Sarawak General Hospital from June 2023 to August 2024. Combined use was defined as reporting at least one listed T&CM practice or supplementary product during the preceding six months. Frequencies and percentages summarised reported practices, products, and reasons for no listed use. Pearson chi-square tests examined differences in combined-use status across participant characteristics. Results: Overall, 298 participants (69.1%) met the combined-use definition. However, only 51 participants (17.1% of combined users; 11.8% of the total sample) reported at least one listed traditional practice. Supplementary products predominated, especially fortified milk or colostrum (182/298, 61.1%) and vitamins or minerals (158/298, 53.0%). Combined-use status differed significantly by age group (p = .033), ethnicity (p = .018), residence (p = .018), and educational attainment (p = .048), but not household income, employment status, or cancer stage. Among 133 participants reporting no listed use, 99 (74.4%) had not considered T&CM. Conclusion: The high combined-use estimate was driven mainly by supplementary products rather than traditional therapeutic practices. Distinguishing practices from products provides a more meaningful account of patient behaviour and supports more precise, nonjudgmental oncology follow-up discussions. Future research should examine product formulation, dose, purpose, disclosure, expenditure, and timing in relation to cancer treatment within culturally diverse cancer care settings such as Sarawak.

International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management SciencesVol. 15(4)
Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.