Strive-R1: Proactive retrieval-augmented reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards

Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning (RAR) mitigates the static knowledge limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external evidence acquisition into reasoning. Recent work has introduced reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize retrieval jointly with reasoning. However, many RL-based RAR methods still organize retrieval reactively, where search is triggered by local uncertainty or immediate evidence gaps. This can weaken coordination across retrieval steps, especially when multiple pieces of evidence must be progressively collected and connected. To address this issue, we propose Strive-R1, a framework for proactive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards. Specifically, Strive-R1 realizes strategic retrieval control through a structured Plan–Search–Reflect (PSR) process, in which planning sets an initial retrieval direction, reflection assesses the current trajectory and, when available, the retrieved information to determine the next action, and search acquires external evidence when further retrieval is required. In Strive-R1, PSR is not used as a fixed prompting heuristic, but learned as a multi-step retrieval-control behavior through RL. We further introduce Hierarchical Verifiable Rewards (HVR), which organize the Answer Outcome Reward, Token-Level F1 Reward, Reflection-based Auxiliary Process Signal, and Format Reward into a conditionally activated hierarchy without a learned neural reward model. Experiments on seven QA benchmarks show that Strive-R1 consistently outperforms strong baselines, with larger gains on multi-hop tasks. Additional evaluations indicate that the learned retrieval–reasoning policies can generalize to different domains and retrieval corpora. Ablation studies show that PSR provides the main gains and HVR offers complementary improvements while helping regulate search depth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Processing & Management
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2026.105220
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strive-R1: Proactive retrieval-augmented reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards

Abibulla Atawulla, Fengyi Yang, Yating Yang, Bo Han et al.
Information Processing & Management
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Strive-R1: Proactive retrieval-augmented reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards

Abibulla Atawulla, Fengyi Yang, Yating Yang, Bo Han, Xi Zhou, Yunfei Han, Xiangyu Liu, Ran Bi
article en

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning (RAR) mitigates the static knowledge limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external evidence acquisition into reasoning. Recent work has introduced reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize retrieval jointly with reasoning. However, many RL-based RAR methods still organize retrieval reactively, where search is triggered by local uncertainty or immediate evidence gaps. This can weaken coordination across retrieval steps, especially when multiple pieces of evidence must be progressively collected and connected. To address this issue, we propose Strive-R1, a framework for proactive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards. Specifically, Strive-R1 realizes strategic retrieval control through a structured Plan–Search–Reflect (PSR) process, in which planning sets an initial retrieval direction, reflection assesses the current trajectory and, when available, the retrieved information to determine the next action, and search acquires external evidence when further retrieval is required. In Strive-R1, PSR is not used as a fixed prompting heuristic, but learned as a multi-step retrieval-control behavior through RL. We further introduce Hierarchical Verifiable Rewards (HVR), which organize the Answer Outcome Reward, Token-Level F1 Reward, Reflection-based Auxiliary Process Signal, and Format Reward into a conditionally activated hierarchy without a learned neural reward model. Experiments on seven QA benchmarks show that Strive-R1 consistently outperforms strong baselines, with larger gains on multi-hop tasks. Additional evaluations indicate that the learned retrieval–reasoning policies can generalize to different domains and retrieval corpora. Ablation studies show that PSR provides the main gains and HVR offers complementary improvements while helping regulate search depth.

Information Processing & ManagementVol. 64(2)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security, Science and Technology Department of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.