Strive-R1: Proactive retrieval-augmented reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards
Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning (RAR) mitigates the static knowledge limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) by incorporating external evidence acquisition into reasoning. Recent work has introduced reinforcement learning (RL) to optimize retrieval jointly with reasoning. However, many RL-based RAR methods still organize retrieval reactively, where search is triggered by local uncertainty or immediate evidence gaps. This can weaken coordination across retrieval steps, especially when multiple pieces of evidence must be progressively collected and connected. To address this issue, we propose Strive-R1, a framework for proactive Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning with strategic retrieval control and hierarchical verifiable rewards. Specifically, Strive-R1 realizes strategic retrieval control through a structured Plan–Search–Reflect (PSR) process, in which planning sets an initial retrieval direction, reflection assesses the current trajectory and, when available, the retrieved information to determine the next action, and search acquires external evidence when further retrieval is required. In Strive-R1, PSR is not used as a fixed prompting heuristic, but learned as a multi-step retrieval-control behavior through RL. We further introduce Hierarchical Verifiable Rewards (HVR), which organize the Answer Outcome Reward, Token-Level F1 Reward, Reflection-based Auxiliary Process Signal, and Format Reward into a conditionally activated hierarchy without a learned neural reward model. Experiments on seven QA benchmarks show that Strive-R1 consistently outperforms strong baselines, with larger gains on multi-hop tasks. Additional evaluations indicate that the learned retrieval–reasoning policies can generalize to different domains and retrieval corpora. Ablation studies show that PSR provides the main gains and HVR offers complementary improvements while helping regulate search depth.
Authors
- Abibulla Atawulla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-9779)
- Fengyi Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-8503)
- Yating Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2639-3944)
- Bo Han (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0983-9382)
- Xi Zhou (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-1765)
- Yunfei Han (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7455-9008)
- Xiangyu Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1680-4788)
- Ran Bi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6947-7130)
Institutions
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry (CN)
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Information Processing & Management
- Published
- 2026-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2026.105220
- Primary Topic
- Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Province
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Chinese Academy of Sciences
- Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security
- Science and Technology Department of Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region