Composition‐Dependent Mechanical, Thermal, and Surface Properties of Stereolithography‐Printed TPU / PMMA Photopolymer Blends

ABSTRACT Photocurable thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends were formulated for stereolithography (SLA) to examine how blend composition affects intermolecular interactions, phase morphology, thermal behavior, mechanical response, and surface wettability of photocured networks. TPU‐based photocurable resin, PMMA‐based photocurable resin, and four intermediate blends (TPU: PMMA = 9:1, 7:3, 1:1, and 3:7, w/w) were printed under a single optimized, fully dense (100% infill) parameter set. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed that all compositions remained physically blended, with carbonyl‐ and amide‐band positions consistent with composition‐dependent urethane–carbonyl hydrogen bonding. FE‐SEM surface‐morphology imaging of the as‐printed surfaces showed a shift from fibrous, textured features in TPU‐rich compositions to denser, smoother features as PMMA content increased. Differential scanning calorimetry of the two most contrasting compositions (7:3 and 1:1) showed a sharp sub‐ambient thermal event, tentatively attributed to a melting‐type transition of ordered TPU soft‐segment domains rather than a glass transition, shifting from −14°C (7:3) to −11°C (1:1) with increasing PMMA content; this assignment remains provisional given the proximity to the lower instrumental limit and the two‐composition dataset. Thermogravimetric analysis across all six compositions showed that thermal stability generally increased with PMMA content, with the 3:7 blend showing the highest onset decomposition temperature and char yield. Static contact angle and swelling measurements identified the 7:3 composition as the most hydrophilic (37.4°) and most swollen (2.37% at 18 h) in the series. Tensile testing showed PMMA‐based photocurable resin to be the strongest and stiffest composition (30.5 MPa, 17.2 MPa modulus) and TPU‐based photocurable resin the most extensible (96.5% elongation), while the 3:7 blend offered the best overall strength–stiffness–ductility balance among the blended compositions (14.2 MPa, 12.2 MPa modulus, 70.3% elongation); the 7:3 and 1:1 compositions are lower‐modulus, elastomer‐dominated formulations rather than high‐performance structural materials. Collectively, these results provide composition‐dependent structural observations for photocurable TPU/PMMA blends and illustrate compositional control as an accessible route for tuning the mechanical, thermal, and surface behavior of SLA‐printed polymer networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Engineering and Science
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.70879
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Composition‐Dependent Mechanical, Thermal, and Surface Properties of Stereolithography‐Printed TPU / PMMA Photopolymer Blends

Aparna Zagabathuni, Vivek C. Ravi, Swathi Surendran Valayangadi
Polymer Engineering and Science
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Composition‐Dependent Mechanical, Thermal, and Surface Properties of Stereolithography‐Printed TPU / PMMA Photopolymer Blends

Aparna Zagabathuni, Vivek C. Ravi, Swathi Surendran Valayangadi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Photocurable thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends were formulated for stereolithography (SLA) to examine how blend composition affects intermolecular interactions, phase morphology, thermal behavior, mechanical response, and surface wettability of photocured networks. TPU‐based photocurable resin, PMMA‐based photocurable resin, and four intermediate blends (TPU: PMMA = 9:1, 7:3, 1:1, and 3:7, w/w) were printed under a single optimized, fully dense (100% infill) parameter set. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed that all compositions remained physically blended, with carbonyl‐ and amide‐band positions consistent with composition‐dependent urethane–carbonyl hydrogen bonding. FE‐SEM surface‐morphology imaging of the as‐printed surfaces showed a shift from fibrous, textured features in TPU‐rich compositions to denser, smoother features as PMMA content increased. Differential scanning calorimetry of the two most contrasting compositions (7:3 and 1:1) showed a sharp sub‐ambient thermal event, tentatively attributed to a melting‐type transition of ordered TPU soft‐segment domains rather than a glass transition, shifting from −14°C (7:3) to −11°C (1:1) with increasing PMMA content; this assignment remains provisional given the proximity to the lower instrumental limit and the two‐composition dataset. Thermogravimetric analysis across all six compositions showed that thermal stability generally increased with PMMA content, with the 3:7 blend showing the highest onset decomposition temperature and char yield. Static contact angle and swelling measurements identified the 7:3 composition as the most hydrophilic (37.4°) and most swollen (2.37% at 18 h) in the series. Tensile testing showed PMMA‐based photocurable resin to be the strongest and stiffest composition (30.5 MPa, 17.2 MPa modulus) and TPU‐based photocurable resin the most extensible (96.5% elongation), while the 3:7 blend offered the best overall strength–stiffness–ductility balance among the blended compositions (14.2 MPa, 12.2 MPa modulus, 70.3% elongation); the 7:3 and 1:1 compositions are lower‐modulus, elastomer‐dominated formulations rather than high‐performance structural materials. Collectively, these results provide composition‐dependent structural observations for photocurable TPU/PMMA blends and illustrate compositional control as an accessible route for tuning the mechanical, thermal, and surface behavior of SLA‐printed polymer networks.

Polymer Engineering and Science
National Institute of Technology Calicut (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.