Reforming Institutional Design for Fairness: Evictions from Toronto Community Housing, 2002–2014

Abstract This article examines institutional safeguards for fairness in rent-arrears evictions from the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC). It reconstructs the reform sequence that led to the adoption of a novel—possibly unique—institutional mechanism: the Office of the Commissioner for Housing Equity (OCHE), an independent accountability mechanism for procedural fairness in evictions. It was a contingent institutional response to tragic administrative failings, not a response to judges’ or legislatures’ external oversight. Several individuals shaped the reform, subject to political and economic constraints. The history is interesting in its own right. It is a tragic vignette. But it also has broader relevance for administrative law scholars, and for others who are interested in the relationship between law and public policy. Institutional structures like the OCHE are one version of “internal administrative law.” Reforms to that kind of law are often invisible to legal scholars. This article makes one such story visible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2026.10060
Primary Topic
Administrative Law and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reforming Institutional Design for Fairness: Evictions from Toronto Community Housing, 2002–2014

Nathaniel Reilly
Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
Administrative Law and Governance
article

Reforming Institutional Design for Fairness: Evictions from Toronto Community Housing, 2002–2014

Nathaniel Reilly
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines institutional safeguards for fairness in rent-arrears evictions from the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC). It reconstructs the reform sequence that led to the adoption of a novel—possibly unique—institutional mechanism: the Office of the Commissioner for Housing Equity (OCHE), an independent accountability mechanism for procedural fairness in evictions. It was a contingent institutional response to tragic administrative failings, not a response to judges’ or legislatures’ external oversight. Several individuals shaped the reform, subject to political and economic constraints. The history is interesting in its own right. It is a tragic vignette. But it also has broader relevance for administrative law scholars, and for others who are interested in the relationship between law and public policy. Institutional structures like the OCHE are one version of “internal administrative law.” Reforms to that kind of law are often invisible to legal scholars. This article makes one such story visible.

Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société
University of Oxford (GB)
McGill University
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Administrative Law and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.