Face-to-face videolaryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in microgravity

Abstract Long-duration space missions will require crews to manage medical emergencies autonomously, including airway management in microgravity. In weightlessness, the lack of gravitational reference alters operator–patient orientation and may complicate procedures such as tracheal intubation, particularly for operators with limited airway experience. We conducted a crossover study during parabolic flights generating repeated periods of microgravity. Six novice operators performed 135 tracheal intubation attempts on an airway manikin using either a face-to-face Airtraq® videolaryngoscopy configuration (AIR-F2F) or a conventional behind-the-head McGrath® videolaryngoscopy approach (MG-CONV). Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements. AIR-F2F achieved a higher success rate than MG-CONV (90.3% vs. 63.0%). The odds of successful intubation were significantly higher with AIR-F2F (odds ratio 6.4, 95% CI 2.3–18.0; P < 0.001). Intubation was faster and perceived as less difficult with AIR-F2F, whereas glottic visualization was similar between techniques. These findings suggest that operator–patient orientation may influence airway management performance in microgravity and could inform the design of airway management procedures for future autonomous space missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Microgravity
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41526-026-00662-5
Primary Topic
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Face-to-face videolaryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in microgravity

G DHONNEUR, Séamus Thierry, Khoubeyb Abdelhafidh, Ron Birnbaum et al.
npj Microgravity
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
article

Face-to-face videolaryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in microgravity

G DHONNEUR, Séamus Thierry, Khoubeyb Abdelhafidh, Ron Birnbaum, Nicolas Bertrand
article en

Abstract

Abstract Long-duration space missions will require crews to manage medical emergencies autonomously, including airway management in microgravity. In weightlessness, the lack of gravitational reference alters operator–patient orientation and may complicate procedures such as tracheal intubation, particularly for operators with limited airway experience. We conducted a crossover study during parabolic flights generating repeated periods of microgravity. Six novice operators performed 135 tracheal intubation attempts on an airway manikin using either a face-to-face Airtraq® videolaryngoscopy configuration (AIR-F2F) or a conventional behind-the-head McGrath® videolaryngoscopy approach (MG-CONV). Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects models accounting for repeated measurements. AIR-F2F achieved a higher success rate than MG-CONV (90.3% vs. 63.0%). The odds of successful intubation were significantly higher with AIR-F2F (odds ratio 6.4, 95% CI 2.3–18.0; P < 0.001). Intubation was faster and perceived as less difficult with AIR-F2F, whereas glottic visualization was similar between techniques. These findings suggest that operator–patient orientation may influence airway management performance in microgravity and could inform the design of airway management procedures for future autonomous space missions.

npj Microgravity
Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Bretagne Sud (FR), Clinique Saint Jean (BE), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor (FR), Institut Régional d'Administration de Bastia (FR), Centre Hospitalier de Saint Jean de Dieu (FR), Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc (FR), Centre Cardiologique du Nord (FR)
Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.