A randomized phase II study of fulvestrant with or without ganetespib in patients with endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Patients with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have limited effective treatment options. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) regulates estrogen receptor stability and function; its inhibition has been proposed as a strategy to overcome endocrine resistance. Ganetespib is a second-generation HSP90 inhibitor with demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical breast cancer models. METHODS: In this randomized phase II study, 50 patients with HR+ MBC previously treated with endocrine therapy were randomized 1:2 to fulvestrant alone (n = 15) or fulvestrant with ganetespib (n = 35), respectively. Median age was 53 years. Fulvestrant was administered at standard dosing; ganetespib (200 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Median PFS was similar between arms (3.7 vs. 3.6 months; log-rank p = 0.79). Toxicity was higher with ganetespib, with substantially increased diarrhea (97% vs. 7%) and nausea (63% vs. 40%). Exploratory genomic analysis of on-treatment biopsies (n = 13) showed ESR1 mutations were enriched among patients without clinical benefit, while all patients with clinical benefit exhibited a Luminal A transcriptional subtype. Tumors lacking clinical benefit showed enrichment of proliferative and cell cycle-associated transcriptional programs. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ganetespib to fulvestrant did not improve clinical outcomes and increased toxicity in endocrine-resistant HR+ MBC. Our findings support the hypothesis that ESR1 alterations and proliferative transcriptional activity contribute to established endocrine resistance, limiting the therapeutic impact of HSP90 inhibition in this setting. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01560416.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag414
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A randomized phase II study of fulvestrant with or without ganetespib in patients with endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer

Sandro Santagata, Albert Grinshpun, Molly K. DiLullo, Ian E. Krop et al.
The Oncologist
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

A randomized phase II study of fulvestrant with or without ganetespib in patients with endocrine resistant metastatic breast cancer

Sandro Santagata, Albert Grinshpun, Molly K. DiLullo, Ian E. Krop, Myles A Brown, Ann H. Partridge, Luke J. Whitesell, Katherine Elizabeth Reeder-Hayes, Nancy U. Lin, Rinath M. Jeselsohn, CK Anders, McKenna Moore, Patrick Kurnia, Jingxin Fu, Eric P. Winer, Hao Guo, Erica L. Mayer, Adrienne Gropper Waks, Tianyu Li, Ashka Patel, Stefan Atanasov
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with endocrine-resistant hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have limited effective treatment options. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) regulates estrogen receptor stability and function; its inhibition has been proposed as a strategy to overcome endocrine resistance. Ganetespib is a second-generation HSP90 inhibitor with demonstrated anti-tumor activity in preclinical breast cancer models. METHODS: In this randomized phase II study, 50 patients with HR+ MBC previously treated with endocrine therapy were randomized 1:2 to fulvestrant alone (n = 15) or fulvestrant with ganetespib (n = 35), respectively. Median age was 53 years. Fulvestrant was administered at standard dosing; ganetespib (200 mg/m2) was given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety/tolerability. RESULTS: Median PFS was similar between arms (3.7 vs. 3.6 months; log-rank p = 0.79). Toxicity was higher with ganetespib, with substantially increased diarrhea (97% vs. 7%) and nausea (63% vs. 40%). Exploratory genomic analysis of on-treatment biopsies (n = 13) showed ESR1 mutations were enriched among patients without clinical benefit, while all patients with clinical benefit exhibited a Luminal A transcriptional subtype. Tumors lacking clinical benefit showed enrichment of proliferative and cell cycle-associated transcriptional programs. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ganetespib to fulvestrant did not improve clinical outcomes and increased toxicity in endocrine-resistant HR+ MBC. Our findings support the hypothesis that ESR1 alterations and proliferative transcriptional activity contribute to established endocrine resistance, limiting the therapeutic impact of HSP90 inhibition in this setting. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01560416.

The Oncologist
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
Israel Cancer Research Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.