Surgical and Radiographic Outcomes in Cervical Deformity Patients with High T1 Slope and High C2 Slope (HTHC) Versus Low T1 Slope and High C2 Slope (LTHC)

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter operative cervical deformity (CD) database. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) together identify distinct CD phenotypes: cervical-only versus global sagittal deformity, and to compare surgical invasiveness, radiographic correction, and patient-reported outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: T1S and C2S mark cervical malalignment, and elevated T1S has been linked to global sagittal malalignment. Combining them may distinguish CD-only from global deformity on cervical imaging alone. METHODS: Operative CD patients with ≥2 years follow-up and preoperative C2S >30° were stratified by T1S into low T1S-high C2S (LTHC; ≤30°) and high T1S-high C2S (HTHC; >30°). Multivariable regression assessed group effect on 2-year NDI change, adjusted for age, sex, baseline NDI, and posterior levels fused. NDI MCID was set a priori at ≥7 points per the ISSG threshold. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met criteria (31 LTHC, 61 HTHC). HTHC patients were older (64.7 vs. 60.0 years; P=0.035) with higher Charlson index (P=0.022). Preoperatively, HTHC had greater thoracic kyphosis, TPA, cSVA, PI-LL mismatch, and C7 SVA (all P≤0.010). HTHC underwent more extensive surgery: more posterior levels fused (10.3 vs. 6.7), more circumferential fusions (66.7% vs. 38.7%), and more caudal LIV (T7 vs. T3) (all P<0.05). At 2 years, HTHC retained higher TK and cSVA despite greater absolute correction. Baseline NDI was similar (P=0.906), but 2-year NDI improvement was smaller in HTHC (-6.2 vs. -14.6 points; P=0.013), and fewer achieved MCID (45.9% vs. 71.0%; P=0.022). HTHC remained an independent predictor of smaller improvement (β=+7.4; P=0.020). Reoperation, DJK, and complication rates did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Among CD patients with elevated C2S, additional elevated T1S identifies a global-deformity phenotype requiring more invasive correction and showing smaller 2-year patient-reported improvement despite comparable complications. T1S and C2S, measurable on cervical imaging alone, screen for which CD patients warrant full-spine imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multicenter data).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000005902
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical and Radiographic Outcomes in Cervical Deformity Patients with High T1 Slope and High C2 Slope (HTHC) Versus Low T1 Slope and High C2 Slope (LTHC)

Lawrence G. Lenke, Peter Gust Passias, Christopher Pearson Ames, Alex Soroceanu et al.
Spine
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Surgical and Radiographic Outcomes in Cervical Deformity Patients with High T1 Slope and High C2 Slope (HTHC) Versus Low T1 Slope and High C2 Slope (LTHC)

Lawrence G. Lenke, Peter Gust Passias, Christopher Pearson Ames, Alex Soroceanu, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Themistocles Stavros Protopsaltis, Eric O. Klineberg, Darryl Lau, Jeffrey Lynn Gum, Gregory M. Mundis, Richard A. Hostin, Shay R. Bess, Zoe A. Norris, Munish Chandra Gupta, Virginie Lafage, David Kojo Hamilton, Frank J. Schwab, Eaman Balouch, Robert K. Eastlack, Alexander Kucherina, on behalf of the International Spine Study Group (ISSG), Justin S. Smith, Renaud Lafage, Sang Lee
article en

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter operative cervical deformity (CD) database. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) together identify distinct CD phenotypes: cervical-only versus global sagittal deformity, and to compare surgical invasiveness, radiographic correction, and patient-reported outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: T1S and C2S mark cervical malalignment, and elevated T1S has been linked to global sagittal malalignment. Combining them may distinguish CD-only from global deformity on cervical imaging alone. METHODS: Operative CD patients with ≥2 years follow-up and preoperative C2S >30° were stratified by T1S into low T1S-high C2S (LTHC; ≤30°) and high T1S-high C2S (HTHC; >30°). Multivariable regression assessed group effect on 2-year NDI change, adjusted for age, sex, baseline NDI, and posterior levels fused. NDI MCID was set a priori at ≥7 points per the ISSG threshold. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients met criteria (31 LTHC, 61 HTHC). HTHC patients were older (64.7 vs. 60.0 years; P=0.035) with higher Charlson index (P=0.022). Preoperatively, HTHC had greater thoracic kyphosis, TPA, cSVA, PI-LL mismatch, and C7 SVA (all P≤0.010). HTHC underwent more extensive surgery: more posterior levels fused (10.3 vs. 6.7), more circumferential fusions (66.7% vs. 38.7%), and more caudal LIV (T7 vs. T3) (all P<0.05). At 2 years, HTHC retained higher TK and cSVA despite greater absolute correction. Baseline NDI was similar (P=0.906), but 2-year NDI improvement was smaller in HTHC (-6.2 vs. -14.6 points; P=0.013), and fewer achieved MCID (45.9% vs. 71.0%; P=0.022). HTHC remained an independent predictor of smaller improvement (β=+7.4; P=0.020). Reoperation, DJK, and complication rates did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Among CD patients with elevated C2S, additional elevated T1S identifies a global-deformity phenotype requiring more invasive correction and showing smaller 2-year patient-reported improvement despite comparable complications. T1S and C2S, measurable on cervical imaging alone, screen for which CD patients warrant full-spine imaging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multicenter data).

Spine
Northwell Health (US), Scripps Health (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Calgary (CA), Norton Healthcare (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Southwest Scoliosis Institute (US), Duke University Health System (US), Neurological Surgery (US), University of Virginia (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.