Are Petrea volubilis and P. arborea (Verbenaceae) Conspecific? New Insights From Anatomy

ABSTRACT Correct taxonomic identity is crucial in plant taxonomy, especially in the case of practically good species that are considered conspecific due to lack of sufficient reliable data, such as those studied here. Linnaeus in 1753 established the genus Petrea L. with a single species P. volubilis L. Later, Kunth added two species P. arborea Kunth and P. rugosa Kunth. Though, Moldenke in his monographic work considered both P. arborea and P. volubilis as good species, however, recent works treated both conspecific and accept P. arborea as synonym of P. volubilis . In the present study, comprehensive morphological, micro‐morphological and anatomical investigations were conducted on the mentioned two species of Petrea , viz., P. arborea and P. volubilis , collected from different regions of India. Detail morphological (habit and leaf), micro‐morphological (both light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (trichomes and stomata)) and anatomical (t.s. of internode, leaf midrib and minor venation) characteristics were monitored. The studied results advocate that a few significant morphological, micro‐morphological and anatomical traits are critical in both the species and have immense diagnostic value, which denotes them as good species rather than conspecific.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Feddes Repertorium
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/fedr.70184
Primary Topic
Plant Diversity and Evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are Petrea volubilis and P. arborea (Verbenaceae) Conspecific? New Insights From Anatomy

Debabrata Maity, Sourav Naskar
Feddes Repertorium
Plant Diversity and Evolution
article

Are Petrea volubilis and P. arborea (Verbenaceae) Conspecific? New Insights From Anatomy

Debabrata Maity, Sourav Naskar
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Correct taxonomic identity is crucial in plant taxonomy, especially in the case of practically good species that are considered conspecific due to lack of sufficient reliable data, such as those studied here. Linnaeus in 1753 established the genus Petrea L. with a single species P. volubilis L. Later, Kunth added two species P. arborea Kunth and P. rugosa Kunth. Though, Moldenke in his monographic work considered both P. arborea and P. volubilis as good species, however, recent works treated both conspecific and accept P. arborea as synonym of P. volubilis . In the present study, comprehensive morphological, micro‐morphological and anatomical investigations were conducted on the mentioned two species of Petrea , viz., P. arborea and P. volubilis , collected from different regions of India. Detail morphological (habit and leaf), micro‐morphological (both light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (trichomes and stomata)) and anatomical (t.s. of internode, leaf midrib and minor venation) characteristics were monitored. The studied results advocate that a few significant morphological, micro‐morphological and anatomical traits are critical in both the species and have immense diagnostic value, which denotes them as good species rather than conspecific.

Feddes RepertoriumVol. 137(4)
University of Calcutta (IN)
University Grants Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Plant Diversity and Evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.