Preparation for bias conversations among Black/African American, Latinx, and Asian parent‐adolescent dyads: A qualitative content analysis of observational data

Abstract Preparation for bias conversations may be critical in raising youth awareness of racial‐ethnic discrimination, fostering a strong racial‐ethnic identity, and teaching them how to cope or respond to racialized stressors. However, the literature relies almost exclusively on survey approaches, limiting understanding of how these conversations actually unfold in real time. The present study used qualitative content analysis of observational data to describe the strategies 151 Black/African American, Latinx, and Asian parents ( M age = 41.63, SD = 6.16) and youth aged 11–14 years ( M age = 12.16, SD = 0.91) discussed to respond to four discrimination scenarios that varied in the location, the power asymmetry, and the nature of the interaction. Black/African American parents were primarily U.S.‐born whereas Latinx and Asian parents were predominantly first‐generation immigrants. We aimed to center participants' words to understand how they respond to discrimination in context, whether parents and youth differed, and how this may vary across racial‐ethnic groups. We identified strategies that could be categorized into ignoring the perpetrator, confronting, support‐seeking, reporting, activism, and protective compliance. Unique to our analysis was the ability to distinguish how strategies were embedded in the type of discrimination stressor, the context of race/ethnicity, and youth‐ versus parent‐suggested strategies. Though there was a broad range of strategies that were suggested, the findings illustrate that the context of the discrimination matters and that parents and youth also value different approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.70241
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparation for bias conversations among Black/African American, Latinx, and Asian parent‐adolescent dyads: A qualitative content analysis of observational data

Lisa Kiang, Gabriela Livas Stein, Frances M. Lobo, Paula Sánchez–Hernández et al.
Journal of Research on Adolescence
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Preparation for bias conversations among Black/African American, Latinx, and Asian parent‐adolescent dyads: A qualitative content analysis of observational data

Lisa Kiang, Gabriela Livas Stein, Frances M. Lobo, Paula Sánchez–Hernández, Stephanie Irby Coard, Michelle Y. Martin Romero, Kimberly Cang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Preparation for bias conversations may be critical in raising youth awareness of racial‐ethnic discrimination, fostering a strong racial‐ethnic identity, and teaching them how to cope or respond to racialized stressors. However, the literature relies almost exclusively on survey approaches, limiting understanding of how these conversations actually unfold in real time. The present study used qualitative content analysis of observational data to describe the strategies 151 Black/African American, Latinx, and Asian parents ( M age = 41.63, SD = 6.16) and youth aged 11–14 years ( M age = 12.16, SD = 0.91) discussed to respond to four discrimination scenarios that varied in the location, the power asymmetry, and the nature of the interaction. Black/African American parents were primarily U.S.‐born whereas Latinx and Asian parents were predominantly first‐generation immigrants. We aimed to center participants' words to understand how they respond to discrimination in context, whether parents and youth differed, and how this may vary across racial‐ethnic groups. We identified strategies that could be categorized into ignoring the perpetrator, confronting, support‐seeking, reporting, activism, and protective compliance. Unique to our analysis was the ability to distinguish how strategies were embedded in the type of discrimination stressor, the context of race/ethnicity, and youth‐ versus parent‐suggested strategies. Though there was a broad range of strategies that were suggested, the findings illustrate that the context of the discrimination matters and that parents and youth also value different approaches.

Journal of Research on AdolescenceVol. 36(4)
University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US), Greensboro Science Center (US), Greensboro College (US), Wake Forest University (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
William T. Grant Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.