Shared leadership and ai-enabled contingency planning in Ukrainian firms during the 2022–2025 war

The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, which began in February 2022, caused acute and long-term disruptions in the activities of Ukrainian companies, forcing them to quickly rebuild their organizational structures, decision-making mechanisms, and planning practices. This article offers a conceptual and analytical explanation of how wartime conditions accelerated the transition from centralised management measures to cross-functional crisis teams, shared leadership mechanisms and emerging learning operating models. This study is based on secondary data analysis and illustrative case studies, rather than original empirical research. It combines business survey data, institutional and corporate reports, and academic literature. On this basis, the article outlines an organizational trajectory from centralization to distributed cross-functional decision-making and beyond to what this study defines as a learning operating model. The article also highlights that AI-enabled practices (including situational dashboards, scenario modeling, demand forecasting, and knowledge management) supported by generative AI can accelerate collective situational awareness in wartime. However, role overload and coordination burdens can also increase in the absence of clarity of purpose. Thus, shared leadership in the study is viewed as potentially “a dual-effect organizational mechanism”. The conclusions outline the implications for Ukrainian business practices and compare the identified trajectories of organizational response of Ukrainian companies with future constraints associated with the European model of AI governance. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by establishing a link among shared leadership, contingency planning, and AI-based situational analysis in the specific context of business resilience in wartime. And its practical contribution is to identify organizational conditions under which AI tools can support distributed decision making without increasing coordination overhead.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mokslo taikomieji tyrimai / Applied Research
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59476/mtt2026.v2i22.777
Primary Topic
Corporate Management and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared leadership and ai-enabled contingency planning in Ukrainian firms during the 2022–2025 war

Halyna Mishenina
Mokslo taikomieji tyrimai / Applied Research
Corporate Management and Leadership
article

Shared leadership and ai-enabled contingency planning in Ukrainian firms during the 2022–2025 war

Halyna Mishenina
article en

Abstract

The full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation, which began in February 2022, caused acute and long-term disruptions in the activities of Ukrainian companies, forcing them to quickly rebuild their organizational structures, decision-making mechanisms, and planning practices. This article offers a conceptual and analytical explanation of how wartime conditions accelerated the transition from centralised management measures to cross-functional crisis teams, shared leadership mechanisms and emerging learning operating models. This study is based on secondary data analysis and illustrative case studies, rather than original empirical research. It combines business survey data, institutional and corporate reports, and academic literature. On this basis, the article outlines an organizational trajectory from centralization to distributed cross-functional decision-making and beyond to what this study defines as a learning operating model. The article also highlights that AI-enabled practices (including situational dashboards, scenario modeling, demand forecasting, and knowledge management) supported by generative AI can accelerate collective situational awareness in wartime. However, role overload and coordination burdens can also increase in the absence of clarity of purpose. Thus, shared leadership in the study is viewed as potentially “a dual-effect organizational mechanism”. The conclusions outline the implications for Ukrainian business practices and compare the identified trajectories of organizational response of Ukrainian companies with future constraints associated with the European model of AI governance. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by establishing a link among shared leadership, contingency planning, and AI-based situational analysis in the specific context of business resilience in wartime. And its practical contribution is to identify organizational conditions under which AI tools can support distributed decision making without increasing coordination overhead.

Mokslo taikomieji tyrimai / Applied ResearchVol. 2(22)
Klaipėda University (LT)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Corporate Management and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.