Freezing performance of selective artificial ground freezing based on three-pipe structure and its influencing analysis

Selective artificial ground freezing (S-AGF) enables directional cooling and mitigates unnecessary thermal loss through air-insulated casings, thereby exhibiting superior energy-saving and stratum-protection performance relative to conventional artificial ground freezing (C-AGF). Existing S-AGF investigations have primarily concentrated on single-pipe configurations, whereas the parametric mechanisms and matching principles governing multi-pipe layouts, which are extensively deployed in engineering practice, remain insufficiently elucidated, and quantitative criteria for refined design are still lacking. Therefore, the COMSOL-based thermo-hydraulic coupled numerical simulations were conducted to investigate the freezing performance and its influencing for three-pipe S-AGF. Comparative analyses were conducted between S-AGF and C-AGF regarding frozen-wall evolution, temperature-field distribution, and energy consumption; furthermore. And the quantitative influences of pipe spacing, coolant temperature, flow velocity, and air-insulation-layer thickness on directional freezing performance were elucidated. The results demonstrate that S-AGF effectively suppresses heat diffusion within non-target strata, yielding a 50.0% reduction in peak energy consumption and a 22.6% reduction in cycle-averaged energy consumption. Pipe spacing has the dominant influence on freezing behavior, when it increases from 222 mm to 372 mm, frozen-wall closure time increases by 158%, and 322 mm is identified as the optimal spacing that balances formation efficiency and temperature uniformity. Reducing the coolant temperature from −20 °C to −35 °C shortens closure time and qualified formation time by 28.72% and 30.33%, respectively. Coolant velocity demonstrates limited regulatory capacity, with 2.0 m/s identified as the effective threshold beyond which additional velocity increments yield negligible efficiency improvements. The air gap exhibits an optimal thickness of 3.8 mm; exceeding this thickness triggers internal natural convection and consequently deteriorates insulation performance. This study could provide the quantitative design references for layout optimization, coolant-system selection, and insulated-casing fabrication in practical directional-freezing engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2026.108592
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freezing performance of selective artificial ground freezing based on three-pipe structure and its influencing analysis

Qingyang Ren, Jun Ding, Chenyu Wang, Hongfei Xie et al.
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
article

Freezing performance of selective artificial ground freezing based on three-pipe structure and its influencing analysis

Qingyang Ren, Jun Ding, Chenyu Wang, Hongfei Xie, Xihao Gong, Wenlei Wei, Songqiang Xiao, Liang Cheng, Guilin Hou, Wenfeng Zhang
article en

Abstract

Selective artificial ground freezing (S-AGF) enables directional cooling and mitigates unnecessary thermal loss through air-insulated casings, thereby exhibiting superior energy-saving and stratum-protection performance relative to conventional artificial ground freezing (C-AGF). Existing S-AGF investigations have primarily concentrated on single-pipe configurations, whereas the parametric mechanisms and matching principles governing multi-pipe layouts, which are extensively deployed in engineering practice, remain insufficiently elucidated, and quantitative criteria for refined design are still lacking. Therefore, the COMSOL-based thermo-hydraulic coupled numerical simulations were conducted to investigate the freezing performance and its influencing for three-pipe S-AGF. Comparative analyses were conducted between S-AGF and C-AGF regarding frozen-wall evolution, temperature-field distribution, and energy consumption; furthermore. And the quantitative influences of pipe spacing, coolant temperature, flow velocity, and air-insulation-layer thickness on directional freezing performance were elucidated. The results demonstrate that S-AGF effectively suppresses heat diffusion within non-target strata, yielding a 50.0% reduction in peak energy consumption and a 22.6% reduction in cycle-averaged energy consumption. Pipe spacing has the dominant influence on freezing behavior, when it increases from 222 mm to 372 mm, frozen-wall closure time increases by 158%, and 322 mm is identified as the optimal spacing that balances formation efficiency and temperature uniformity. Reducing the coolant temperature from −20 °C to −35 °C shortens closure time and qualified formation time by 28.72% and 30.33%, respectively. Coolant velocity demonstrates limited regulatory capacity, with 2.0 m/s identified as the effective threshold beyond which additional velocity increments yield negligible efficiency improvements. The air gap exhibits an optimal thickness of 3.8 mm; exceeding this thickness triggers internal natural convection and consequently deteriorates insulation performance. This study could provide the quantitative design references for layout optimization, coolant-system selection, and insulated-casing fabrication in practical directional-freezing engineering applications.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 87
Ningxia University (CN), Merchants Chongqing Communications Research and Design Institute (CN), Ningxia Water Conservancy (CN), Chongqing Construction Engineering Investment Holding (China) (CN), State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Mountain Bridge and Tunnel Engineering (CN), Chongqing Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chongqing Science and Technology Commission, Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing, Chongqing Science and Technology Commission
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.