Modernizing Canada’s Regulations for Clinical Trials in Medical Emergencies

Keywords: clinical trials; emergency; stroke• Health Canada recently announced the publication of proposed Clinical Trial Regulations, with specific sections addressing consent practices for clinical trials in medical emergencies.• These regulations aim to simplify existing guidelines on how clinical trials are conducted in Canada and modernize the regulatory framework to support innovation and reduce inefficiencies.• With this goal in mind, the proposed regulations can be modified to reframe the criteria that permit emergency consent procedures, clarify the extent of effort required to identify substitute decision-makers and consider the process of written consent in the context of participation in a clinical trial in a medical emergency.In December 2025, Health Canada announced updates to its Clinical Trial Regulations and invited public comment.Several of these updates pertain to the conduct of clinical trials in medical emergencies.As stroke researchers engaged in major clinical trials, we propose the following changes to consent practices for clinical trials conducted in medical emergencies: the justification of emergency consent procedures should be based on a model of minimizing harm; seeking consent from a substitute decision-maker should not go beyond the patient's bedside; and the written content of informed consent should be abbreviated in medical emergencies. What is the Current Emergency Consent Procedure in the Context of Acute Stroke Trials?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2026.10670
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modernizing Canada’s Regulations for Clinical Trials in Medical Emergencies

Andrew M. Demchuk, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Ubong Udoh, Bijoy K. Menon et al.
Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Modernizing Canada’s Regulations for Clinical Trials in Medical Emergencies

Andrew M. Demchuk, Michel Christopher Frank Shamy, Ubong Udoh, Bijoy K. Menon, Michael D. Hill
article en

Abstract

Keywords: clinical trials; emergency; stroke• Health Canada recently announced the publication of proposed Clinical Trial Regulations, with specific sections addressing consent practices for clinical trials in medical emergencies.• These regulations aim to simplify existing guidelines on how clinical trials are conducted in Canada and modernize the regulatory framework to support innovation and reduce inefficiencies.• With this goal in mind, the proposed regulations can be modified to reframe the criteria that permit emergency consent procedures, clarify the extent of effort required to identify substitute decision-makers and consider the process of written consent in the context of participation in a clinical trial in a medical emergency.In December 2025, Health Canada announced updates to its Clinical Trial Regulations and invited public comment.Several of these updates pertain to the conduct of clinical trials in medical emergencies.As stroke researchers engaged in major clinical trials, we propose the following changes to consent practices for clinical trials conducted in medical emergencies: the justification of emergency consent procedures should be based on a model of minimizing harm; seeking consent from a substitute decision-maker should not go beyond the patient's bedside; and the written content of informed consent should be abbreviated in medical emergencies. What is the Current Emergency Consent Procedure in the Context of Acute Stroke Trials?

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques
University of Calgary (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.