Development and validation of the Chinese Acceptance Scale for university students (CAS) in Hong Kong, China

Background This paper reports the development and validation of the Chinese Acceptance Scale (CAS) as a measure of acceptance of diversity among Chinese university students. Integrating Western and Chinese conceptions of acceptance of diversity, the CAS was initially conceptualized with four dimensions: “diversity of contact,” “comfort with difference,” “appreciation of others,” and “ kuan rong ” (tolerance of others). Methods Study 1 involved content validation by an expert panel ( N = 10), which evaluated 25 items and resulted in a 20-item instrument covering the four proposed dimensions. Study 2 examined the psychometric properties of the CAS using two waves of data from 963 university students, assessing factor structure, measurement invariance, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability. Results Confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the initial four-factor model. However, the results indicated that “appreciation of others” and “kuan rong” were better represented as a single factor. The revised three-factor model consisted of “diversity of contact,” “comfort with difference,” and “inclusive appreciation.” This model showed good factorial validity, measurement invariance over time, and satisfactory reliability. Convergent and discriminant validity were also supported at the total-scale level, although further examination of these properties at the subscale level is needed. Overall, the findings suggest that the CAS can be used to assess acceptance of diversity among Chinese university students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1965526
Primary Topic
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of the Chinese Acceptance Scale for university students (CAS) in Hong Kong, China

Daniel T. L. Shek, Lindan Tan, Esther Y. W. Shek, Chaoran Sun et al.
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
article

Development and validation of the Chinese Acceptance Scale for university students (CAS) in Hong Kong, China

Daniel T. L. Shek, Lindan Tan, Esther Y. W. Shek, Chaoran Sun, Liyang Luo, Xiang Li
article en

Abstract

Background This paper reports the development and validation of the Chinese Acceptance Scale (CAS) as a measure of acceptance of diversity among Chinese university students. Integrating Western and Chinese conceptions of acceptance of diversity, the CAS was initially conceptualized with four dimensions: “diversity of contact,” “comfort with difference,” “appreciation of others,” and “ kuan rong ” (tolerance of others). Methods Study 1 involved content validation by an expert panel ( N = 10), which evaluated 25 items and resulted in a 20-item instrument covering the four proposed dimensions. Study 2 examined the psychometric properties of the CAS using two waves of data from 963 university students, assessing factor structure, measurement invariance, convergent and discriminant validity, and reliability. Results Confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the initial four-factor model. However, the results indicated that “appreciation of others” and “kuan rong” were better represented as a single factor. The revised three-factor model consisted of “diversity of contact,” “comfort with difference,” and “inclusive appreciation.” This model showed good factorial validity, measurement invariance over time, and satisfactory reliability. Convergent and discriminant validity were also supported at the total-scale level, although further examination of these properties at the subscale level is needed. Overall, the findings suggest that the CAS can be used to assess acceptance of diversity among Chinese university students.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.