Evaluating Darbepoetin Treatment Strategies for Managing Anaemia in Haemodialysis Patients: Effects on All‐Cause Mortality From a Target Trial Emulation Using Electronic Health Record Data

ABSTRACT Purpose Anaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease, often treated with erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs), but the optimal haemoglobin (Hb) target remains uncertain. Using electronic health records, we emulated a target trial comparing different Hb targets in haemodialysis patients to estimate their effects on mortality. Methods We used electronic health records from UK kidney centres reporting to the UK Renal Registry. Adults aged ≥ 18 years, receiving haemodialysis for ≥ 3 months, and without marked ESA resistance were eligible. Using the clone‐censor‐weight method, we emulated trials comparing Hb targets: (1) 105–125 versus 95–115 g/L and (2) 125–145 versus 95–115 g/L. Darbepoetin dosing followed a standardised protocol with predefined dose adjustments and a maximum dose of 150 μg/week. The outcome was all‐cause mortality over 8 months. Results The study included 8628 patients from 10 centres between 2004 and 2016; 62% male, median age 66 years (IQR 52–76). At baseline, mean Hb was 97.7 g/L (SD 15.1), and 79% of patients were receiving darbepoetin. The hazard ratio for mortality was 0.92 (95% CI 0.75–1.12) for the 105–125 versus 95–115 g/L comparison, and 1.20 (95% CI 0.94–1.54) for the 125–145 versus 95–115 g/L comparison. Adherence to the highest Hb target was lower, limiting precision. Conclusions Targeting an Hb range of 105–125 g/L under controlled ESA dosing was not associated with increased mortality compared with 95–115 g/L. Targeting Hb levels above 125 g/L may increase mortality risk, consistent with previous trial findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Published
2026-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70507
Primary Topic
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Darbepoetin Treatment Strategies for Managing Anaemia in Haemodialysis Patients: Effects on All‐Cause Mortality From a Target Trial Emulation Using Electronic Health Record Data

Jonathan A C Sterne, Eleanor J. Murray, D. Nitsch, Fergus John Caskey et al.
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
article

Evaluating Darbepoetin Treatment Strategies for Managing Anaemia in Haemodialysis Patients: Effects on All‐Cause Mortality From a Target Trial Emulation Using Electronic Health Record Data

Jonathan A C Sterne, Eleanor J. Murray, D. Nitsch, Fergus John Caskey, Kate Birnie, Anna Casula, Yoav Ben-Shlomo
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Anaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease, often treated with erythropoiesis‐stimulating agents (ESAs), but the optimal haemoglobin (Hb) target remains uncertain. Using electronic health records, we emulated a target trial comparing different Hb targets in haemodialysis patients to estimate their effects on mortality. Methods We used electronic health records from UK kidney centres reporting to the UK Renal Registry. Adults aged ≥ 18 years, receiving haemodialysis for ≥ 3 months, and without marked ESA resistance were eligible. Using the clone‐censor‐weight method, we emulated trials comparing Hb targets: (1) 105–125 versus 95–115 g/L and (2) 125–145 versus 95–115 g/L. Darbepoetin dosing followed a standardised protocol with predefined dose adjustments and a maximum dose of 150 μg/week. The outcome was all‐cause mortality over 8 months. Results The study included 8628 patients from 10 centres between 2004 and 2016; 62% male, median age 66 years (IQR 52–76). At baseline, mean Hb was 97.7 g/L (SD 15.1), and 79% of patients were receiving darbepoetin. The hazard ratio for mortality was 0.92 (95% CI 0.75–1.12) for the 105–125 versus 95–115 g/L comparison, and 1.20 (95% CI 0.94–1.54) for the 125–145 versus 95–115 g/L comparison. Adherence to the highest Hb target was lower, limiting precision. Conclusions Targeting an Hb range of 105–125 g/L under controlled ESA dosing was not associated with increased mortality compared with 95–115 g/L. Targeting Hb levels above 125 g/L may increase mortality risk, consistent with previous trial findings.

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug SafetyVol. 35(11)
Boston University (US), Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Southmead Hospital (GB), University of Bristol (GB), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.