The EU 's Indo‐Pacific Strategy and Japan: Insights From a ‘Close Strategic Partner’

ABSTRACT This article examines Japanese perceptions of the European Union's Indo‐Pacific Strategy through interviews with government officials and foreign policy influencers. Respondents considered the EU to be a highly important actor in the Indo‐Pacific context. Three‐quarters of respondents considered the Indo‐Pacific Strategy document to be sufficiently important that it constitutes an upgrade or a positive transformation of the existing relationship. Of the seven issue areas identified in the Indo‐Pacific Strategy, four—Connectivity, Digital, Ocean Governance, and Security and Defence—were identified as policy areas with high potential for future development to be explored. Nevertheless, although the bilateral relationship is characterized as a ‘close strategic partnership’, which has ‘never been stronger than today’, respondents offered three broad areas of constructive criticism of the strategy. These were: a confusing presentation of maritime security in the document; an almost complete lack of coverage of economic security; and broader criticisms regarding EU strategic communication in the Indo‐Pacific. This is problematic because Japanese respondents clearly identified maritime security and economic security as the two most important issues for the bilateral relationship going forward.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Policy
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70246
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The EU 's Indo‐Pacific Strategy and Japan: Insights From a ‘Close Strategic Partner’

Karolina Pomorska, Niels van Willigen, Paul Bacon
Global Policy
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The EU 's Indo‐Pacific Strategy and Japan: Insights From a ‘Close Strategic Partner’

Karolina Pomorska, Niels van Willigen, Paul Bacon
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article examines Japanese perceptions of the European Union's Indo‐Pacific Strategy through interviews with government officials and foreign policy influencers. Respondents considered the EU to be a highly important actor in the Indo‐Pacific context. Three‐quarters of respondents considered the Indo‐Pacific Strategy document to be sufficiently important that it constitutes an upgrade or a positive transformation of the existing relationship. Of the seven issue areas identified in the Indo‐Pacific Strategy, four—Connectivity, Digital, Ocean Governance, and Security and Defence—were identified as policy areas with high potential for future development to be explored. Nevertheless, although the bilateral relationship is characterized as a ‘close strategic partnership’, which has ‘never been stronger than today’, respondents offered three broad areas of constructive criticism of the strategy. These were: a confusing presentation of maritime security in the document; an almost complete lack of coverage of economic security; and broader criticisms regarding EU strategic communication in the Indo‐Pacific. This is problematic because Japanese respondents clearly identified maritime security and economic security as the two most important issues for the bilateral relationship going forward.

Global Policy
Leiden University (NL), Waseda University (JP), Netherlands Defence Academy (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.