Divergent processing strategies for auditory sequence recognition in humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

Deriving sequential information from complex sounds is a challenge for auditory systems, yet it remains unclear whether humans and nonhuman species integrate multidimensional cues or prioritize a single dimension when processing multidimensional input. We investigated how humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) process concurrent acoustic cues using an identical behavioural paradigm with complex-tone sequences. By presenting probe stimuli that selectively preserved or disrupted either pitch or formant trajectory, we quantified these processing strategies. We show that zebra finches employ an additive integration strategy, treating pitch and formant trajectories as complementary components of a unified auditory pattern. In contrast, humans exhibit a dominant reliance on pitch. Experience further modulates this bias, with trained human listeners recruiting secondary cues to preserve learned relational structure when pitch is unreliable. These findings imply a cross-species divergence in auditory representation, suggesting that auditory processing is shaped by an interplay of species-specific priorities and experience-dependent functional substitution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-11035-9
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Divergent processing strategies for auditory sequence recognition in humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

Henkjan Honing, Jiaxin Li, Zhi-Yuan Ning, Carel ten Cate
Communications Biology
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Divergent processing strategies for auditory sequence recognition in humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata)

Henkjan Honing, Jiaxin Li, Zhi-Yuan Ning, Carel ten Cate
article en

Abstract

Deriving sequential information from complex sounds is a challenge for auditory systems, yet it remains unclear whether humans and nonhuman species integrate multidimensional cues or prioritize a single dimension when processing multidimensional input. We investigated how humans and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) process concurrent acoustic cues using an identical behavioural paradigm with complex-tone sequences. By presenting probe stimuli that selectively preserved or disrupted either pitch or formant trajectory, we quantified these processing strategies. We show that zebra finches employ an additive integration strategy, treating pitch and formant trajectories as complementary components of a unified auditory pattern. In contrast, humans exhibit a dominant reliance on pitch. Experience further modulates this bias, with trained human listeners recruiting secondary cues to preserve learned relational structure when pitch is unreliable. These findings imply a cross-species divergence in auditory representation, suggesting that auditory processing is shaped by an interplay of species-specific priorities and experience-dependent functional substitution.

Communications BiologyVol. 9(1)
Leiden University (NL), University of Applied Sciences Leiden (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, China Scholarship Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.