Preparation to Prescribe: Perceptions of Readiness Among Physician Assistant Students and Recent Program Graduates

INTRODUCTION: Physician assistants (PAs) increasingly prescribe medications, yet accreditation standards do not specify prescribing competencies and no validated tool measures PA students' readiness to prescribe. METHODS: In this IRB-approved cross-sectional study, we developed an 88-item Physician Assistant Self-Perceptions of Readiness to Prescribe survey informed by international prescribing frameworks. Validity and reliability were evaluated by PA faculty experts using content-validity indices, factor analysis, Cronbach α, and a 30-day test-retest. The instrument was administered electronically to didactic students, clinical students, and recent graduates from one PA program. RESULTS: The survey demonstrated high content validity and excellent internal consistency (α ≈ 0.98). Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors; 15 items loaded below 0.50. Forty-four participants responded to the initial survey. Mean readiness scores rose across training stages (didactic students = 4.16, clinical students = 4.81, and graduates = 5.04 on a 1-6 scale). Respondents felt most prepared in understanding patient needs and learning prescribing "on the job" and least prepared in formulary knowledge and personal prescribing confidence. DISCUSSION: This survey offers educators a validated tool to assess prescribing readiness and identifies specific gaps in formulary knowledge and prescribing confidence. Incorporating explicit prescribing competencies and broader multiprogram testing could promote safer, more effective prescribing by PAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physician Assistant Education
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/jpa.0000000000000798
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparation to Prescribe: Perceptions of Readiness Among Physician Assistant Students and Recent Program Graduates

Elle Campbell, Carl Fasser, James Ashton Madsen
The Journal of Physician Assistant Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Preparation to Prescribe: Perceptions of Readiness Among Physician Assistant Students and Recent Program Graduates

Elle Campbell, Carl Fasser, James Ashton Madsen
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Physician assistants (PAs) increasingly prescribe medications, yet accreditation standards do not specify prescribing competencies and no validated tool measures PA students' readiness to prescribe. METHODS: In this IRB-approved cross-sectional study, we developed an 88-item Physician Assistant Self-Perceptions of Readiness to Prescribe survey informed by international prescribing frameworks. Validity and reliability were evaluated by PA faculty experts using content-validity indices, factor analysis, Cronbach α, and a 30-day test-retest. The instrument was administered electronically to didactic students, clinical students, and recent graduates from one PA program. RESULTS: The survey demonstrated high content validity and excellent internal consistency (α ≈ 0.98). Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 factors; 15 items loaded below 0.50. Forty-four participants responded to the initial survey. Mean readiness scores rose across training stages (didactic students = 4.16, clinical students = 4.81, and graduates = 5.04 on a 1-6 scale). Respondents felt most prepared in understanding patient needs and learning prescribing "on the job" and least prepared in formulary knowledge and personal prescribing confidence. DISCUSSION: This survey offers educators a validated tool to assess prescribing readiness and identifies specific gaps in formulary knowledge and prescribing confidence. Incorporating explicit prescribing competencies and broader multiprogram testing could promote safer, more effective prescribing by PAs.

The Journal of Physician Assistant Education
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.