User Perceptions of Robotaxis and Mode Choice Among Robotaxi, Transit, and Ridesharing

Robotaxi services have gained popularity in early adopter cities. What remains unclear is who uses robotaxis and why, and how passengers choose between robotaxis and other modes. By providing an on-demand, door-to-door service that could be cheaper than conventional ridesharing, robotaxis could lead to higher vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and lower transit ridership. A better understanding of user perceptions of robotaxis and how the service might affect mode choice could inform strategies to ensure the transport system is efficient. We collected an online survey of 411 robotaxi users in Phoenix and San Francisco in the US, and used descriptive statistics and mixed logit models to analyze user attitudes toward robotaxis and their impact on ridesharing services and transit, and user preferences when choosing among robotaxis, ridesharing, and transit. Results showed that robotaxis replaced ridesharing and transit. Respondents were receptive to robotaxi expansion. Respondents’ likelihood of choosing robotaxis was related to gender, income, and educational attainment. Respondents considered the time spent traveling in robotaxis to be less burdensome than that spent traveling in transit or ridesharing vehicles. Our findings highlighted the need to enhance the travel experience of female transit riders, the need to prepare for increased VMT, and the challenges facing transit agencies to retain ridership amid competition from robotaxis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981261487420
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

User Perceptions of Robotaxis and Mode Choice Among Robotaxi, Transit, and Ridesharing

Erick Guerra, Xiaoxia Dong, Zhongjie Lin, Ziyi Tang et al.
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

User Perceptions of Robotaxis and Mode Choice Among Robotaxi, Transit, and Ridesharing

Erick Guerra, Xiaoxia Dong, Zhongjie Lin, Ziyi Tang, Yadan Luo
article en

Abstract

Robotaxi services have gained popularity in early adopter cities. What remains unclear is who uses robotaxis and why, and how passengers choose between robotaxis and other modes. By providing an on-demand, door-to-door service that could be cheaper than conventional ridesharing, robotaxis could lead to higher vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and lower transit ridership. A better understanding of user perceptions of robotaxis and how the service might affect mode choice could inform strategies to ensure the transport system is efficient. We collected an online survey of 411 robotaxi users in Phoenix and San Francisco in the US, and used descriptive statistics and mixed logit models to analyze user attitudes toward robotaxis and their impact on ridesharing services and transit, and user preferences when choosing among robotaxis, ridesharing, and transit. Results showed that robotaxis replaced ridesharing and transit. Respondents were receptive to robotaxi expansion. Respondents’ likelihood of choosing robotaxis was related to gender, income, and educational attainment. Respondents considered the time spent traveling in robotaxis to be less burdensome than that spent traveling in transit or ridesharing vehicles. Our findings highlighted the need to enhance the travel experience of female transit riders, the need to prepare for increased VMT, and the challenges facing transit agencies to retain ridership amid competition from robotaxis.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.