Potential Benefit of Effective Implementation of Timely Postoperative Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the potential benefit of survival of receiving timely postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of human papilloma virus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who received adjuvant radiation were included. Exposure groups included timely PORT or delayed PORT (≤42 or >42 days from surgery to radiotherapy, respectively). The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Inverse probability weighted models were used to estimate OS in the counter-factual scenario that all patients started radiation within 6 weeks while adjusting for confounding. Observed OS was for the entire cohort, while predicted OS was for the generated model of universal timely PORT within 6 weeks. Survival analyses were replicated for demographic and clinical subgroups. RESULTS: In total, 58,184 patients were included. Patients were mostly male, white, and non-Hispanic. The observed average 5-year OS was similar to the predicted OS (observed 0.58, 95% CI: 0.57-0.578; predicted 0.58, 95% CI: 0.57-0.59). The largest predicted benefit for timely PORT was seen in privately insured, white, rural, males, and with hypopharyngeal and stage IV cancer, though confidence intervals included the null hypothesis. Conversely, black patients were predicted to have a decline in OS with timely PORT (observed 0.54, 95% CI 0.53-0.56; predicted 0.50, 95% CI 0.46-0.52). CONCLUSION: For the overall cohort and other subgroups, even if optimally implemented, timely PORT is not predicted to improve OS. Modeling outcomes can guide resource allocation to the most impactful interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otolaryngology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.70484
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential Benefit of Effective Implementation of Timely Postoperative Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

Sean T. Massa, Alexis L. Hartman, Lisa M. Velez‐Velez, Peter Q. Luong et al.
Otolaryngology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Potential Benefit of Effective Implementation of Timely Postoperative Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer

Sean T. Massa, Alexis L. Hartman, Lisa M. Velez‐Velez, Peter Q. Luong, Angela Mazul
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the potential benefit of survival of receiving timely postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for head and neck cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2020. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of human papilloma virus (HPV)-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who received adjuvant radiation were included. Exposure groups included timely PORT or delayed PORT (≤42 or >42 days from surgery to radiotherapy, respectively). The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Inverse probability weighted models were used to estimate OS in the counter-factual scenario that all patients started radiation within 6 weeks while adjusting for confounding. Observed OS was for the entire cohort, while predicted OS was for the generated model of universal timely PORT within 6 weeks. Survival analyses were replicated for demographic and clinical subgroups. RESULTS: In total, 58,184 patients were included. Patients were mostly male, white, and non-Hispanic. The observed average 5-year OS was similar to the predicted OS (observed 0.58, 95% CI: 0.57-0.578; predicted 0.58, 95% CI: 0.57-0.59). The largest predicted benefit for timely PORT was seen in privately insured, white, rural, males, and with hypopharyngeal and stage IV cancer, though confidence intervals included the null hypothesis. Conversely, black patients were predicted to have a decline in OS with timely PORT (observed 0.54, 95% CI 0.53-0.56; predicted 0.50, 95% CI 0.46-0.52). CONCLUSION: For the overall cohort and other subgroups, even if optimally implemented, timely PORT is not predicted to improve OS. Modeling outcomes can guide resource allocation to the most impactful interventions.

Otolaryngology
University of Pittsburgh (US), Saint Louis University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.