Machine learning in diabetic-foot osteomyelitis: current applications, challenges, and future directions

Background : Diabetic-foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a severe complication of diabetic-foot ulcers associated with delayed healing, amputation, and increased mortality. Machine learning (ML) has increasingly been explored for diagnosis and clinical decision-making in diabetic-foot care; however, the current evidence specific to DFO has not been systematically synthesized. Methods : We performed systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2000 and May 2026. Studies that developed or evaluated ML models for DFO diagnosis, prediction, or outcomes were included. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, reporting followed PRISMA 2020 and TRIPOD-SRMA recommendations, and methodological quality was evaluated using PROBAST + AI. Due to considerable heterogeneity, narrative synthesis was performed. Results : A total of 10 studies published from 2022 to 2026 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies developed or evaluated ML models with a direct DFO diagnostic endpoint, one additional study evaluated model explainability, and four evaluated complementary DFO-relevant diabetic-foot applications. Reported discrimination ranged from 0.879 to 0.998, but comparisons were limited by differences in clinical endpoints, reference standards, input modalities and validation strategies. Only one direct DFO model was externally validated, and no study developed a multimodal model combining clinical and imaging data. Conclusion : Current evidence is limited by heterogeneous methodologies, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting despite promising discrimination reported by several models. Future studies should evaluate whether multimodal models integrating clinical and imaging data provide incremental value over unimodal approaches, with external validation, calibration, and clinical utility assessment before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-11-623-2026
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning in diabetic-foot osteomyelitis: current applications, challenges, and future directions

Aaron Joseph Tande, Sergio L. Alvarez-Mulett, Francesco Petri, Fabio Borgonovo et al.
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Machine learning in diabetic-foot osteomyelitis: current applications, challenges, and future directions

Aaron Joseph Tande, Sergio L. Alvarez-Mulett, Francesco Petri, Fabio Borgonovo, Elie F. Berbari, Seyed Mohammad Amin Alavi, Farzad Pourghazi, Michael E. Torchia, Takahiro Matsuo, Andrea Gori
article en

Abstract

Background : Diabetic-foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a severe complication of diabetic-foot ulcers associated with delayed healing, amputation, and increased mortality. Machine learning (ML) has increasingly been explored for diagnosis and clinical decision-making in diabetic-foot care; however, the current evidence specific to DFO has not been systematically synthesized. Methods : We performed systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 2000 and May 2026. Studies that developed or evaluated ML models for DFO diagnosis, prediction, or outcomes were included. Data extraction was performed using the CHARMS framework, reporting followed PRISMA 2020 and TRIPOD-SRMA recommendations, and methodological quality was evaluated using PROBAST + AI. Due to considerable heterogeneity, narrative synthesis was performed. Results : A total of 10 studies published from 2022 to 2026 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies developed or evaluated ML models with a direct DFO diagnostic endpoint, one additional study evaluated model explainability, and four evaluated complementary DFO-relevant diabetic-foot applications. Reported discrimination ranged from 0.879 to 0.998, but comparisons were limited by differences in clinical endpoints, reference standards, input modalities and validation strategies. Only one direct DFO model was externally validated, and no study developed a multimodal model combining clinical and imaging data. Conclusion : Current evidence is limited by heterogeneous methodologies, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting despite promising discrimination reported by several models. Future studies should evaluate whether multimodal models integrating clinical and imaging data provide incremental value over unimodal approaches, with external validation, calibration, and clinical utility assessment before clinical implementation.

Journal of Bone and Joint InfectionVol. 11(5)
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (IR), Mayo Clinic (US), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), University of Milan (IT), Luigi Sacco Hospital (IT), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Health Science (IT), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.