Architecture-guided reconstructive decision-making for large and giant intracranial aneurysms: A 42-case strategy-oriented series

Objective: To describe an architecture-guided reconstructive decision-making framework for large and giant intracranial aneurysms and to illustrate its clinical applicability using a consecutive institutional series. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 42 consecutive patients harboring 42 large or giant intracranial aneurysms treated between January 2017 and July 2025. Lesions were classified according to lesion architecture and reconstructive controllability. Clinical outcomes, angiographic aneurysm exclusion, and procedure-related complications were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one aneurysms (73.8%) were classified as non-terminal type and 11 (26.2%) as terminal type. Flow diversion was primarily applied to non-terminal aneurysms, whereas terminal aneurysms were preferentially treated by microsurgical reconstruction. Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) were achieved in all patients treated with flow diversion and in 95.5% of those treated microsurgically. Complete aneurysm exclusion was confirmed at follow-up angiographic evaluation in all cases, including O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grade D at the predefined 1-year angiographic endpoint in all endovascularly treated aneurysms. Terminal aneurysms frequently incorporated branch origins, limiting complete aneurysm exclusion by flow diversion alone because preservation of branch patency necessitated persistent flow across the bifurcation. Among the 42 aneurysms, 39 (92.9%) were classified as large aneurysms (10-24 mm) and 3 (7.1%) as giant aneurysms (≥25 mm). Conclusions: Treatment selection for large and giant intracranial aneurysms may be guided by lesion architecture through the assessment of reconstructive controllability rather than morphology alone. The proposed framework provides a modality-neutral approach for integrating microsurgical and endovascular reconstructive strategies according to the anatomical characteristics of individual lesions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2026.e2026.06.006
Primary Topic
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architecture-guided reconstructive decision-making for large and giant intracranial aneurysms: A 42-case strategy-oriented series

Shigeyuki Sakamoto, Kazutoshi Mukada, Yosuke Kajihara, Hideo Ohba et al.
Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
article

Architecture-guided reconstructive decision-making for large and giant intracranial aneurysms: A 42-case strategy-oriented series

Shigeyuki Sakamoto, Kazutoshi Mukada, Yosuke Kajihara, Hideo Ohba, Yuko Miyazaki, Shinji Ohba, Toshiyuki Tsuboi, Masaki Sunaga
article en

Abstract

Objective: To describe an architecture-guided reconstructive decision-making framework for large and giant intracranial aneurysms and to illustrate its clinical applicability using a consecutive institutional series. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 42 consecutive patients harboring 42 large or giant intracranial aneurysms treated between January 2017 and July 2025. Lesions were classified according to lesion architecture and reconstructive controllability. Clinical outcomes, angiographic aneurysm exclusion, and procedure-related complications were analyzed. Results: Thirty-one aneurysms (73.8%) were classified as non-terminal type and 11 (26.2%) as terminal type. Flow diversion was primarily applied to non-terminal aneurysms, whereas terminal aneurysms were preferentially treated by microsurgical reconstruction. Favorable clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-2) were achieved in all patients treated with flow diversion and in 95.5% of those treated microsurgically. Complete aneurysm exclusion was confirmed at follow-up angiographic evaluation in all cases, including O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grade D at the predefined 1-year angiographic endpoint in all endovascularly treated aneurysms. Terminal aneurysms frequently incorporated branch origins, limiting complete aneurysm exclusion by flow diversion alone because preservation of branch patency necessitated persistent flow across the bifurcation. Among the 42 aneurysms, 39 (92.9%) were classified as large aneurysms (10-24 mm) and 3 (7.1%) as giant aneurysms (≥25 mm). Conclusions: Treatment selection for large and giant intracranial aneurysms may be guided by lesion architecture through the assessment of reconstructive controllability rather than morphology alone. The proposed framework provides a modality-neutral approach for integrating microsurgical and endovascular reconstructive strategies according to the anatomical characteristics of individual lesions.

Journal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.