Enhancing fairness in climate action through policy packages

Abstract Achieving a fair transition to climate neutrality requires a careful balancing of policy options. Here we quantitatively evaluate the equity implications of different European Union climate policy packages, considering pricing, regulation via standards, subsidies and transfers. Leveraging an integrated modelling framework, we show that standards limit impact variability within income groups, whereas carbon pricing with transfer-based revenue recycling offsets regressive impacts between income groups. Restricting climate policy implementation to either option, therefore, gives rise to a trade-off between horizontal and vertical equity. We then demonstrate numerically how a multi-instrument budget-neutral policy package can resolve this trade-off. Adopting a broader equity perspective that encompasses both horizontal and vertical equity shifts the preferred policy mix towards a combination of standards, pricing, subsidies and transfers. These results provide an explicit, quantified, equity-based rationale for the adoption and acceptability of comprehensive climate policy packages, offering a more nuanced view on policy design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Climate Change
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-026-02751-5
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing fairness in climate action through policy packages

Florian Landis, Toon Vandyck, Matthias Weitzel, Umed Temursho et al.
Nature Climate Change
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Enhancing fairness in climate action through policy packages

Florian Landis, Toon Vandyck, Matthias Weitzel, Umed Temursho, David Klenert
article en

Abstract

Abstract Achieving a fair transition to climate neutrality requires a careful balancing of policy options. Here we quantitatively evaluate the equity implications of different European Union climate policy packages, considering pricing, regulation via standards, subsidies and transfers. Leveraging an integrated modelling framework, we show that standards limit impact variability within income groups, whereas carbon pricing with transfer-based revenue recycling offsets regressive impacts between income groups. Restricting climate policy implementation to either option, therefore, gives rise to a trade-off between horizontal and vertical equity. We then demonstrate numerically how a multi-instrument budget-neutral policy package can resolve this trade-off. Adopting a broader equity perspective that encompasses both horizontal and vertical equity shifts the preferred policy mix towards a combination of standards, pricing, subsidies and transfers. These results provide an explicit, quantified, equity-based rationale for the adoption and acceptability of comprehensive climate policy packages, offering a more nuanced view on policy design.

Nature Climate Change
Joint Research Center (ES), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), KU Leuven (BE)
European Commission, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.