Towards a neurodiverse planning theory and practice

Since the emergence of the neurodiversity movement a few decades ago and its emphasis on neurocognitive differences rather than ‘deficits’, the impact of the living environment on the everyday lives of neurodivergent individuals has been central to the community’s pursuit of inclusion and participation. The built environment, as the physical setting in which these experiences unfold, is therefore of particular relevance to these pursuits. As such, urban planning, alongside related disciplines concerned with the material and spatial organisation of the built environment, has an important role to play in advancing this agenda. Despite this, urban planning theory and practice have largely failed to engage with neurodiversity and its call for the recognition of difference within shared urban environments. Drawing on scholarship on the urban politics of difference, this commentary calls for the integration of neurodiversity into urban planning theory and practice, initiating a debate for a neurodiverse planning theory and practice with the aim of informing future theoretical development and empirical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Studies
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261494812
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a neurodiverse planning theory and practice

Sven Bölte, Sonya J. Girdler, Mohammad Sarraf
Urban Studies
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Towards a neurodiverse planning theory and practice

Sven Bölte, Sonya J. Girdler, Mohammad Sarraf
article en

Abstract

Since the emergence of the neurodiversity movement a few decades ago and its emphasis on neurocognitive differences rather than ‘deficits’, the impact of the living environment on the everyday lives of neurodivergent individuals has been central to the community’s pursuit of inclusion and participation. The built environment, as the physical setting in which these experiences unfold, is therefore of particular relevance to these pursuits. As such, urban planning, alongside related disciplines concerned with the material and spatial organisation of the built environment, has an important role to play in advancing this agenda. Despite this, urban planning theory and practice have largely failed to engage with neurodiversity and its call for the recognition of difference within shared urban environments. Drawing on scholarship on the urban politics of difference, this commentary calls for the integration of neurodiversity into urban planning theory and practice, initiating a debate for a neurodiverse planning theory and practice with the aim of informing future theoretical development and empirical research.

Urban Studies
Curtin University (AU), RISE Research Institutes of Sweden (SE), Stockholm County Council (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE)
VINNOVA, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.