Is there a neural common factor for visual illusions?

It has been reported that the surface area of the human primary visual cortex predicts the susceptibility to several spatial contextual illusions. Yet, contrary to common belief, illusions correlate only weakly at the perceptual level, raising the question of how they can correlate with a neural measure like V1 surface area. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that there is substantial interindividual variability not only in neural function and anatomy but also in the mapping between the two, which further challenges the findings of a neural common factor for illusions. In light of these concerns, our first goal was to re-evaluate the previous imaging results. Seeking to investigate whether these findings generalize, we expanded our study to other illusions. We could not replicate previous findings and did not find any other significant correlations, either at the perceptual level or between illusion susceptibility and visual functional neuroanatomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Vision
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.26.10.13
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is there a neural common factor for visual illusions?

H. Herzog Michael, Maya A. Jastrzębowska, Aline F. Cretenoud, Ayberk Ozkirli et al.
Journal of Vision
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Is there a neural common factor for visual illusions?

H. Herzog Michael, Maya A. Jastrzębowska, Aline F. Cretenoud, Ayberk Ozkirli, Bogdan Draganski
article en

Abstract

It has been reported that the surface area of the human primary visual cortex predicts the susceptibility to several spatial contextual illusions. Yet, contrary to common belief, illusions correlate only weakly at the perceptual level, raising the question of how they can correlate with a neural measure like V1 surface area. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that there is substantial interindividual variability not only in neural function and anatomy but also in the mapping between the two, which further challenges the findings of a neural common factor for illusions. In light of these concerns, our first goal was to re-evaluate the previous imaging results. Seeking to investigate whether these findings generalize, we expanded our study to other illusions. We could not replicate previous findings and did not find any other significant correlations, either at the perceptual level or between illusion susceptibility and visual functional neuroanatomy.

Journal of VisionVol. 26(10)
Twitter (United States) (US), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH), University of Warsaw (PL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.