Joint cognitive–depression trajectories during aging and risk of new-onset cancer: cross-national evidence from three population-based cohorts

Abstract Background Cognitive decline and depressive symptoms commonly co-occur during aging and may jointly influence cancer risk through chronic inflammation, neuroendocrine dysregulation, and adverse behavioral changes. However, longitudinal evidence on synchronized cognitive–depression trajectories and new-onset cancer remains limited across diverse populations. This study investigated the association between joint cognitive–depression trajectories and new-onset cancer risk using three nationally representative cohorts, while further exploring the consistency of predictor importance using complementary machine learning approaches. Methods Adults aged ≥ 65 years from HRS ( n = 7,077), ELSA ( n = 3,879), and CHARLS ( n = 3,549) who were cancer-free at baseline and had at least three repeated assessments of cognition and depressive symptoms were included. Group-based trajectory modeling identified synchronized cognitive–depression trajectories. Cox proportional hazards models examined associations with new-onset cancer, with Fine–Gray competing risk models, discrete-time logistic regression, and subgroup analyses assessing robustness. Seven machine learning models were developed following LASSO and Boruta feature selection, with SHAP, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis used for interpretation and model evaluation. Results Over median follow-up periods of 10, 6, and 8 years, 1,187, 310, and 100 new-onset cancer cases were identified in HRS, ELSA, and CHARLS, respectively. Two trajectory groups were consistently identified: High Cognition and Low CESD, and Low Cognition and High CESD. Compared with the favorable trajectory, the adverse trajectory was associated with significantly increased new-onset cancer risk in HRS (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05–1.45), ELSA (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.57–2.67), and CHARLS (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.03–2.52). Findings were robust across multiple models. CatBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, and cognitive–depression trajectory was consistently identified as a key predictor. Conclusions Synchronized cognitive decline and worsening depressive symptoms were significantly associated with elevated new-onset cancer risk across three countries. Joint cognitive–depression trajectories may represent a potential behavioral–psychological indicator associated with cancer risk among older adults; however, their clinical utility for individual-level risk stratification or cancer prevention requires further prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08433-3
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joint cognitive–depression trajectories during aging and risk of new-onset cancer: cross-national evidence from three population-based cohorts

Wei Yan, Lixin Zhao, Jinsong Wu, Mengshuang Xie et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Health disparities and outcomes
article

Joint cognitive–depression trajectories during aging and risk of new-onset cancer: cross-national evidence from three population-based cohorts

Wei Yan, Lixin Zhao, Jinsong Wu, Mengshuang Xie, Wenyan Dong, Wei Wang, Yi Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cognitive decline and depressive symptoms commonly co-occur during aging and may jointly influence cancer risk through chronic inflammation, neuroendocrine dysregulation, and adverse behavioral changes. However, longitudinal evidence on synchronized cognitive–depression trajectories and new-onset cancer remains limited across diverse populations. This study investigated the association between joint cognitive–depression trajectories and new-onset cancer risk using three nationally representative cohorts, while further exploring the consistency of predictor importance using complementary machine learning approaches. Methods Adults aged ≥ 65 years from HRS ( n = 7,077), ELSA ( n = 3,879), and CHARLS ( n = 3,549) who were cancer-free at baseline and had at least three repeated assessments of cognition and depressive symptoms were included. Group-based trajectory modeling identified synchronized cognitive–depression trajectories. Cox proportional hazards models examined associations with new-onset cancer, with Fine–Gray competing risk models, discrete-time logistic regression, and subgroup analyses assessing robustness. Seven machine learning models were developed following LASSO and Boruta feature selection, with SHAP, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis used for interpretation and model evaluation. Results Over median follow-up periods of 10, 6, and 8 years, 1,187, 310, and 100 new-onset cancer cases were identified in HRS, ELSA, and CHARLS, respectively. Two trajectory groups were consistently identified: High Cognition and Low CESD, and Low Cognition and High CESD. Compared with the favorable trajectory, the adverse trajectory was associated with significantly increased new-onset cancer risk in HRS (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.05–1.45), ELSA (HR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.57–2.67), and CHARLS (HR = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.03–2.52). Findings were robust across multiple models. CatBoost demonstrated the best predictive performance, and cognitive–depression trajectory was consistently identified as a key predictor. Conclusions Synchronized cognitive decline and worsening depressive symptoms were significantly associated with elevated new-onset cancer risk across three countries. Joint cognitive–depression trajectories may represent a potential behavioral–psychological indicator associated with cancer risk among older adults; however, their clinical utility for individual-level risk stratification or cancer prevention requires further prospective validation.

BMC Geriatrics
Shandong University (CN), Second Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health disparities and outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.