Mandatory Pregnancy Testing in Uganda: Constitutional and Human Rights Implications

Abstract This article examines the constitutional and human rights implications of mandatory pregnancy testing in Ugandan schools. Using a doctrinal legal approach, it analyses the practice through the lens of Uganda’s 1995 Constitution, regional and international human rights instruments, as well as relevant case law. The article argues that mandatory pregnancy testing and the expulsion of pregnant students infringe on the rights to privacy, non-discrimination, dignity and education. It further maintains that the gendered nature of the practices systematically targets girls, reinforcing harmful cultural norms and institutionalizing educational exclusion. Through a comparative analysis of jurisprudence from East, West and southern Africa, the article demonstrates that such practices fail to meet constitutional standards. It concludes by calling for the abolition of mandatory pregnancy testing, the adoption of inclusive policies that support pregnant learners and the urgent need for legal reforms to align Uganda’s education system with its human rights obligations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of African Law
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021855326101090
Primary Topic
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mandatory Pregnancy Testing in Uganda: Constitutional and Human Rights Implications

Moses Mulumba, Nimrod Muhumuza, Nana Koomson
Journal of African Law
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
article

Mandatory Pregnancy Testing in Uganda: Constitutional and Human Rights Implications

Moses Mulumba, Nimrod Muhumuza, Nana Koomson
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the constitutional and human rights implications of mandatory pregnancy testing in Ugandan schools. Using a doctrinal legal approach, it analyses the practice through the lens of Uganda’s 1995 Constitution, regional and international human rights instruments, as well as relevant case law. The article argues that mandatory pregnancy testing and the expulsion of pregnant students infringe on the rights to privacy, non-discrimination, dignity and education. It further maintains that the gendered nature of the practices systematically targets girls, reinforcing harmful cultural norms and institutionalizing educational exclusion. Through a comparative analysis of jurisprudence from East, West and southern Africa, the article demonstrates that such practices fail to meet constitutional standards. It concludes by calling for the abolition of mandatory pregnancy testing, the adoption of inclusive policies that support pregnant learners and the urgent need for legal reforms to align Uganda’s education system with its human rights obligations.

Journal of African Law
Afya na Haki Institute (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.