Numerical investigations of turbulence modeling and wall effect for the powder flow in a directed energy deposition system

Powder transport in directed energy deposition (DED) is governed by complex interactions among high-speed gas flow, turbulent structures, particle inertia, and the presence of the bottom wall boundary (substrate). In this study, an Eulerian–Lagrangian (EL) framework is developed to investigate powder transport in a four-nozzle directed energy deposition system. The baseline LES–EL configuration is first validated against measured powder concentration profiles. The validated framework is then used to compare large-eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes predictions under matched conditions. The results show that large-eddy simulation captures the jet-merging process and the wall-induced recirculation near the impingement region more accurately, whereas the Reynolds-averaged model produces overly broad turbulence dissipation and substantially underpredicts the turbulence kinetic energy. The results also show that the presence of the wall alters the near-wall flow structure, but this feature is not captured well by the RANS model compared with LES. Because particle motion is primarily inertia-dominated in the present configuration, a particle-only model can predict the overall powder focusing, namely the convergence of the powder stream toward the deposition region, with acceptable accuracy while reducing the computational time by about 95% relative to the LES–EL model. However, resolved gas-phase flow remains necessary to capture the near-wall flow structure and the associated thermal transport. In particular, removal of the inflow produces a much larger hot-fluid region and a significantly higher fluid temperature above the prescribed molten region (melt pool) on the bottom wall, whereas the corresponding increase in mean particle temperature remains limited because of the short particle residence time. These results clarify that simplified models are useful for rapid estimation of global powder-focusing characteristics, while predictive simulations of near-wall flow and thermal behavior in powder-fed DED require resolved flow-field information.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2026.129713
Primary Topic
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical investigations of turbulence modeling and wall effect for the powder flow in a directed energy deposition system

Zong-Lin Yeh, Chien-Chou Tseng, Kuan-Lin Li, Yi‐Ju Chou et al.
International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
article

Numerical investigations of turbulence modeling and wall effect for the powder flow in a directed energy deposition system

Zong-Lin Yeh, Chien-Chou Tseng, Kuan-Lin Li, Yi‐Ju Chou, Yu-Ting Lai
article en

Abstract

Powder transport in directed energy deposition (DED) is governed by complex interactions among high-speed gas flow, turbulent structures, particle inertia, and the presence of the bottom wall boundary (substrate). In this study, an Eulerian–Lagrangian (EL) framework is developed to investigate powder transport in a four-nozzle directed energy deposition system. The baseline LES–EL configuration is first validated against measured powder concentration profiles. The validated framework is then used to compare large-eddy simulation and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes predictions under matched conditions. The results show that large-eddy simulation captures the jet-merging process and the wall-induced recirculation near the impingement region more accurately, whereas the Reynolds-averaged model produces overly broad turbulence dissipation and substantially underpredicts the turbulence kinetic energy. The results also show that the presence of the wall alters the near-wall flow structure, but this feature is not captured well by the RANS model compared with LES. Because particle motion is primarily inertia-dominated in the present configuration, a particle-only model can predict the overall powder focusing, namely the convergence of the powder stream toward the deposition region, with acceptable accuracy while reducing the computational time by about 95% relative to the LES–EL model. However, resolved gas-phase flow remains necessary to capture the near-wall flow structure and the associated thermal transport. In particular, removal of the inflow produces a much larger hot-fluid region and a significantly higher fluid temperature above the prescribed molten region (melt pool) on the bottom wall, whereas the corresponding increase in mean particle temperature remains limited because of the short particle residence time. These results clarify that simplified models are useful for rapid estimation of global powder-focusing characteristics, while predictive simulations of near-wall flow and thermal behavior in powder-fed DED require resolved flow-field information.

International Journal of Heat and Mass TransferVol. 273
National Taiwan University (TW), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
National Science and Technology Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.