Rethinking Wastewater: Value and the Role of Sustainable Technologies in NBS Circular Transitions

This paper critically examines the methodological boundaries of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) within the context of sustainable design and infrastructure systems. By contrasting classical and ecological engineering logics, it reveals analytical blind spots in conventional LCA models, particularly the inability to recognize unrecovered resources, ecological co-benefits, and regenerative potentials. Drawing from case analyses and conceptual comparisons, the study questions the adequacy of cradle frameworks in addressing spatial, biological, and systemic complexities. In response, it proposes an expanded evaluation approach grounded in spatial-temporal dynamics, ecosystem integration, and syntropic principles. The findings support a necessary shift from impact-reduction metrics toward context-sensitive methodologies capable of supporting circular and regenerative design in nature-based solutions (NBS) architecture and infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AGG+
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61892/agg202601018o
Primary Topic
Sustainable Design and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Wastewater: Value and the Role of Sustainable Technologies in NBS Circular Transitions

Darija Gajić, Saša Papuga, Una Okilj
AGG+
Sustainable Design and Development
article

Rethinking Wastewater: Value and the Role of Sustainable Technologies in NBS Circular Transitions

Darija Gajić, Saša Papuga, Una Okilj
article en

Abstract

This paper critically examines the methodological boundaries of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) within the context of sustainable design and infrastructure systems. By contrasting classical and ecological engineering logics, it reveals analytical blind spots in conventional LCA models, particularly the inability to recognize unrecovered resources, ecological co-benefits, and regenerative potentials. Drawing from case analyses and conceptual comparisons, the study questions the adequacy of cradle frameworks in addressing spatial, biological, and systemic complexities. In response, it proposes an expanded evaluation approach grounded in spatial-temporal dynamics, ecosystem integration, and syntropic principles. The findings support a necessary shift from impact-reduction metrics toward context-sensitive methodologies capable of supporting circular and regenerative design in nature-based solutions (NBS) architecture and infrastructure.

AGG+Vol. 14(1)
University of Banja Luka (BA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sustainable Design and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.