Putting Large Language Models into Environmental Context

Abstract The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has fundamentally transformed information interaction, yet their application in environmental science and engineering (ESE) is hindered by multimodal data formats, dynamic context requirements, and hallucination risks. To transition from general-purpose models to domain expert agentic systems, this Perspective introduces a three-pillar framework for ESE-LLMs: domain perception, knowledge grounding, and action capability. Implementing these capabilities introduces potential pitfalls such as geographic representation bias, catastrophic forgetting, and source authenticity vulnerabilities, which require strategic model blending and careful data curation to overcome. Furthermore, rigorous evaluation must extend beyond standard knowledge benchmarks to systematically assess factuality, fairness, consistency, and safety using both human and automated metrics. Finally, we present a decision-guided deployment workflow that helps researchers in ESE fields integrate LLMs into their workflow. Ultimately, achieving trustworthy environmental intelligence relies on continuous evaluation, robust governance, and sustained interdisciplinary collaboration to safely deploy agentic ESE-LLMs for high-stakes environmental challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6c06045
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Putting Large Language Models into Environmental Context

Zhiyong Jason Ren, Jinyue Jiang, Jun‐Jie Zhu
Environmental Science & Technology
Artificial Intelligence Applications
article

Putting Large Language Models into Environmental Context

Zhiyong Jason Ren, Jinyue Jiang, Jun‐Jie Zhu
article en

Abstract

Abstract The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has fundamentally transformed information interaction, yet their application in environmental science and engineering (ESE) is hindered by multimodal data formats, dynamic context requirements, and hallucination risks. To transition from general-purpose models to domain expert agentic systems, this Perspective introduces a three-pillar framework for ESE-LLMs: domain perception, knowledge grounding, and action capability. Implementing these capabilities introduces potential pitfalls such as geographic representation bias, catastrophic forgetting, and source authenticity vulnerabilities, which require strategic model blending and careful data curation to overcome. Furthermore, rigorous evaluation must extend beyond standard knowledge benchmarks to systematically assess factuality, fairness, consistency, and safety using both human and automated metrics. Finally, we present a decision-guided deployment workflow that helps researchers in ESE fields integrate LLMs into their workflow. Ultimately, achieving trustworthy environmental intelligence relies on continuous evaluation, robust governance, and sustained interdisciplinary collaboration to safely deploy agentic ESE-LLMs for high-stakes environmental challenges.

Environmental Science & Technology
Princeton University (US), Arizona State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.