Gender inequality over the lifecycle, information provision and policy preferences

Abstract We conduct a survey experiment with 4000 German respondents, and provide information on two measures of gender inequality, separately or jointly: the gender gap in earnings and the gender gap in pensions. We analyse the effect of providing this information on agreement with the importance of reducing gender inequality, as well as support for policy measures targeted at different stages of the lifecycle and aimed at reducing inequality. We find that providing information on both gaps increases agreement on both accounts. Information on only one gap tends to be insignificant for preferences for policy adoption, but significant for agreement with reducing inequality. The effects of the joint treatment are comparable in magnitude to having personally experienced gender inequality. Young people respond more strongly to information about both gaps, while the single treatments are more effective for women. These individual characteristics also relate to differences in identifying the causes of gender inequality, as shown by answers to an open‐ended question.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economica
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70077
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender inequality over the lifecycle, information provision and policy preferences

Alessandra Casarico, Jana Schuetz, Silke Uebelmesser
Economica
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
article

Gender inequality over the lifecycle, information provision and policy preferences

Alessandra Casarico, Jana Schuetz, Silke Uebelmesser
article en

Abstract

Abstract We conduct a survey experiment with 4000 German respondents, and provide information on two measures of gender inequality, separately or jointly: the gender gap in earnings and the gender gap in pensions. We analyse the effect of providing this information on agreement with the importance of reducing gender inequality, as well as support for policy measures targeted at different stages of the lifecycle and aimed at reducing inequality. We find that providing information on both gaps increases agreement on both accounts. Information on only one gap tends to be insignificant for preferences for policy adoption, but significant for agreement with reducing inequality. The effects of the joint treatment are comparable in magnitude to having personally experienced gender inequality. Young people respond more strongly to information about both gaps, while the single treatments are more effective for women. These individual characteristics also relate to differences in identifying the causes of gender inequality, as shown by answers to an open‐ended question.

Economica
Schiller International University (FR), Bocconi University (IT), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE), Jönköping University (SE)
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Universität Wien, Institutet för arbetsmarknads- och utbildningspolitisk politisk utvärdering
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.