Period-dependent behavior of conditional dispersion in probabilistic seismic demand models

Accuracy and conditional independence are fundamental requirements for probabilistic seismic demand models, which are commonly described by conditional mean demand and conditional dispersion. While the former has been extensively studied in intensity-measure (IM) evaluation, conditional dispersion is often treated as a scatter measure. This study evaluates conditional dispersion for 14 ground-motion IMs and 15 structural models ( T 1 = 0.15 – 4.01 s ). Two metrics are estimated using an event-based block bootstrap procedure: σ E D P ∣ I M provides reference-level estimates of conditional dispersion, reflecting record-to-record variability of the engineering demand parameter (EDP) conditional on an IM, and Δ σ E D P ∣ I M , X characterizes dependence on ground-motion attributes by measuring the maximum variation of attribute-conditioned dispersions with respect to magnitude ( M ), distance ( R ), and site class ( S I ). Limited estimation uncertainty supports the reliability of the estimates, which reveal clear period-dependent behavior. Acceleration-related IMs, especially S a ( T 1 ) , show low dispersion and weak-to-limited attribute dependence for the investigated structures with T 1 = 0.15 – 0.61 s in the acceleration-sensitive region. Velocity-related IMs, especially S v ( T 1 ) , show similar favorable behavior for the investigated structures with T 1 = 0.83 – 4.01 s in the velocity-sensitive region. Response spectral-shape analysis explains this period dependence through the distribution of demand-relevant spectral content and further explains the comparable behavior of simple spectral ordinates and advanced spectral-shape IMs through stable or relatively flat spectral-shape regions. Overall, conditional dispersion is statistically stable and spectrally interpretable. Together with practical seismic-hazard computability, these findings support S a ( T 1 ) and S v ( T 1 ) as appropriate IMs for the corresponding period ranges, facilitating practical decoupling between seismic hazard and demand analyses and helping prevent large dispersion and ground-motion attribute dependence from propagating into downstream performance assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2026.110745
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Period-dependent behavior of conditional dispersion in probabilistic seismic demand models

Dongxu Zhao, Chao Xu, Xun Guo, Lidun Ma et al.
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Period-dependent behavior of conditional dispersion in probabilistic seismic demand models

Dongxu Zhao, Chao Xu, Xun Guo, Lidun Ma, Zengping Wen, Fei Geng, Xiaofen Zhao
article en

Abstract

Accuracy and conditional independence are fundamental requirements for probabilistic seismic demand models, which are commonly described by conditional mean demand and conditional dispersion. While the former has been extensively studied in intensity-measure (IM) evaluation, conditional dispersion is often treated as a scatter measure. This study evaluates conditional dispersion for 14 ground-motion IMs and 15 structural models ( T 1 = 0.15 – 4.01 s ). Two metrics are estimated using an event-based block bootstrap procedure: σ E D P ∣ I M provides reference-level estimates of conditional dispersion, reflecting record-to-record variability of the engineering demand parameter (EDP) conditional on an IM, and Δ σ E D P ∣ I M , X characterizes dependence on ground-motion attributes by measuring the maximum variation of attribute-conditioned dispersions with respect to magnitude ( M ), distance ( R ), and site class ( S I ). Limited estimation uncertainty supports the reliability of the estimates, which reveal clear period-dependent behavior. Acceleration-related IMs, especially S a ( T 1 ) , show low dispersion and weak-to-limited attribute dependence for the investigated structures with T 1 = 0.15 – 0.61 s in the acceleration-sensitive region. Velocity-related IMs, especially S v ( T 1 ) , show similar favorable behavior for the investigated structures with T 1 = 0.83 – 4.01 s in the velocity-sensitive region. Response spectral-shape analysis explains this period dependence through the distribution of demand-relevant spectral content and further explains the comparable behavior of simple spectral ordinates and advanced spectral-shape IMs through stable or relatively flat spectral-shape regions. Overall, conditional dispersion is statistically stable and spectrally interpretable. Together with practical seismic-hazard computability, these findings support S a ( T 1 ) and S v ( T 1 ) as appropriate IMs for the corresponding period ranges, facilitating practical decoupling between seismic hazard and demand analyses and helping prevent large dispersion and ground-motion attribute dependence from propagating into downstream performance assessment.

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake EngineeringVol. 212
Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration (CN), China Earthquake Administration (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.