The clinical outcomes and overall survival in patients with mucoepidermoid and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A comparative analysis of long-term outcomes

PURPOSE: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) are the two most common salivary gland malignancies, but differ substantially in biological behavior, recurrence patterns and long-term prognosis. Comparative data from patients treated within the same institution using similar management strategies remain limited. This study compared long-term survival, recurrence patterns and prognostic factors between MEC and AdCC to identify histology-specific characteristics that may inform follow-up and treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for MEC or AdCC at a tertiary academic center between 1996 and 2022. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence patterns, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (31 AdCC, 31 MEC) were included. Although 5-year OS was identical (81%), AdCC had significantly poorer DFS (53% vs. 80%, p = 0.015) and higher recurrence rates (18/31 vs. 8/31, p = 0.020), and more distant metastases (18/31 vs. 1/31 patients, p = 0.0016). High tumor grade, defined according to tumor-specific pathological criteria, was the strongest independent predictor of poor outcomes (OS: HR = 19.72, p < 0.001; DFS: HR = 3.99, p = 0.01). Advanced T stage, nodal involvement, and metastatic disease independently predicted worse OS. Seven of 11 patients with locoregional recurrence developed a second recurrence, predominantly in AdCC. Curative-intent salvage therapy did not improve OS. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade is the strongest prognostic determinant, surpassing histologic subtype. AdCC demonstrates more aggressive biology with higher recurrence rates and poorer DFS despite similar OS. The limited survival benefit of salvage therapy highlights the need for grade-adapted management and more effective therapies for high-grade disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-026-10659-1
Primary Topic
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The clinical outcomes and overall survival in patients with mucoepidermoid and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A comparative analysis of long-term outcomes

Ido Amir, Eyal Yosefof, Gideon Y. Bachar, Noga Kurman et al.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
article

The clinical outcomes and overall survival in patients with mucoepidermoid and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the salivary glands: A comparative analysis of long-term outcomes

Ido Amir, Eyal Yosefof, Gideon Y. Bachar, Noga Kurman, Nir Tsur, Esmat Najjar, Dan Yaniv, Aiman Elmograbi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) are the two most common salivary gland malignancies, but differ substantially in biological behavior, recurrence patterns and long-term prognosis. Comparative data from patients treated within the same institution using similar management strategies remain limited. This study compared long-term survival, recurrence patterns and prognostic factors between MEC and AdCC to identify histology-specific characteristics that may inform follow-up and treatment strategies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients treated for MEC or AdCC at a tertiary academic center between 1996 and 2022. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence patterns, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (31 AdCC, 31 MEC) were included. Although 5-year OS was identical (81%), AdCC had significantly poorer DFS (53% vs. 80%, p = 0.015) and higher recurrence rates (18/31 vs. 8/31, p = 0.020), and more distant metastases (18/31 vs. 1/31 patients, p = 0.0016). High tumor grade, defined according to tumor-specific pathological criteria, was the strongest independent predictor of poor outcomes (OS: HR = 19.72, p < 0.001; DFS: HR = 3.99, p = 0.01). Advanced T stage, nodal involvement, and metastatic disease independently predicted worse OS. Seven of 11 patients with locoregional recurrence developed a second recurrence, predominantly in AdCC. Curative-intent salvage therapy did not improve OS. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor grade is the strongest prognostic determinant, surpassing histologic subtype. AdCC demonstrates more aggressive biology with higher recurrence rates and poorer DFS despite similar OS. The limited survival benefit of salvage therapy highlights the need for grade-adapted management and more effective therapies for high-grade disease.

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Tel Aviv University (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.