Credibility and strength of evidence for exercise, nutritional, and combined interventions on muscle function and physical performance in older adults: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Age-related declines in muscle mass, strength, and physical performance contribute to frailty, falls, and disability in older adults. This umbrella review evaluated the strength of evidence for exercise, nutritional, and combined interventions on muscle-related and functional outcomes in older adults. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to March 2026 for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261371480). Reviews were appraised using AMSTAR 2, and associations were interpreted according to pooled effects, heterogeneity, review quality, and credibility indicators where available. Because several source reviews did not report all conventional umbrella-review credibility components, evidence credibility was appraised using an adapted, transparent framework rather than treating missing diagnostics as absence of bias. Twenty-eight reviews were retained; eighteen contributed plottable pooled estimates. Methodological confidence was mixed: 10 reviews were rated high or moderate by AMSTAR 2 and 18 were rated low or critically low. Nutrition-only evidence was most favorable for muscle-mass outcomes in sarcopenic or vulnerable phenotypes, but effects on gait speed, SPPB, or frailty were inconsistent without exercise. Combined exercise plus nutrition interventions showed favorable estimates for selected strength and functional outcomes, although several large SMDs came from small or selected sarcopenic samples and require cautious clinical interpretation. The most consistently supported downstream clinical evidence was for exercise-based fall prevention, with reductions in fall rate, risk of falling, and fall-related fractures. The available evidence most consistently supports exercise-containing interventions, particularly for fall-related outcomes. Nutrition-only interventions may provide modest benefits for muscle-mass outcomes in selected vulnerable populations, while combined interventions may improve some strength and functional outcomes. These interpretations remain limited by review overlap, clinical heterogeneity, variable methodological quality, and incomplete credibility assessments. PROSPERO CRD420261371480.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-08393-8
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Credibility and strength of evidence for exercise, nutritional, and combined interventions on muscle function and physical performance in older adults: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Chulin Chen, Yirui Chen, Hairong Cai, Yao Hu et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Credibility and strength of evidence for exercise, nutritional, and combined interventions on muscle function and physical performance in older adults: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

Chulin Chen, Yirui Chen, Hairong Cai, Yao Hu, Qiuping Huang, Jingzhi Zhu, Huiling Cai, Jinyue Huang, Hairong Cai
article en

Abstract

Age-related declines in muscle mass, strength, and physical performance contribute to frailty, falls, and disability in older adults. This umbrella review evaluated the strength of evidence for exercise, nutritional, and combined interventions on muscle-related and functional outcomes in older adults. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched to March 2026 for systematic reviews with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261371480). Reviews were appraised using AMSTAR 2, and associations were interpreted according to pooled effects, heterogeneity, review quality, and credibility indicators where available. Because several source reviews did not report all conventional umbrella-review credibility components, evidence credibility was appraised using an adapted, transparent framework rather than treating missing diagnostics as absence of bias. Twenty-eight reviews were retained; eighteen contributed plottable pooled estimates. Methodological confidence was mixed: 10 reviews were rated high or moderate by AMSTAR 2 and 18 were rated low or critically low. Nutrition-only evidence was most favorable for muscle-mass outcomes in sarcopenic or vulnerable phenotypes, but effects on gait speed, SPPB, or frailty were inconsistent without exercise. Combined exercise plus nutrition interventions showed favorable estimates for selected strength and functional outcomes, although several large SMDs came from small or selected sarcopenic samples and require cautious clinical interpretation. The most consistently supported downstream clinical evidence was for exercise-based fall prevention, with reductions in fall rate, risk of falling, and fall-related fractures. The available evidence most consistently supports exercise-containing interventions, particularly for fall-related outcomes. Nutrition-only interventions may provide modest benefits for muscle-mass outcomes in selected vulnerable populations, while combined interventions may improve some strength and functional outcomes. These interpretations remain limited by review overlap, clinical heterogeneity, variable methodological quality, and incomplete credibility assessments. PROSPERO CRD420261371480.

BMC Geriatrics
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.