Electric vehicles versus drones for mountainous last-mile delivery

Mountainous rural areas face significant challenges for last-mile parcel delivery due to low demand density, poor road conditions, and high transportation costs. This study develops a cost-benefit analysis framework to compare electric vehicle (EV) and drone delivery modes in mountainous terrain. The framework includes a slope-dependent energy consumption model for EVs, a three-dimensional grid-based path planning algorithm for drones accounting for vertical takeoff and landing costs, and optimization models for charging station placement and signal relay tower deployment. Using empirical data from a postal delivery network in mountainous ZhaoDian Township, China, we find that EV delivery is more cost-effective for high-demand, clustered areas, while drone delivery is economically viable for remote, low-demand destinations with limited road access. Demand uncertainty and weather-related flight cancellations reduce the economic viability of drone-only systems. Based on these findings, we derive policy recommendations for establishing a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis framework to evaluate EV and UAV delivery in mountainous regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105667
Primary Topic
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electric vehicles versus drones for mountainous last-mile delivery

Ruoxi Tan, Zhijia Tan, Guangmin Wang
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
article

Electric vehicles versus drones for mountainous last-mile delivery

Ruoxi Tan, Zhijia Tan, Guangmin Wang
article en

Abstract

Mountainous rural areas face significant challenges for last-mile parcel delivery due to low demand density, poor road conditions, and high transportation costs. This study develops a cost-benefit analysis framework to compare electric vehicle (EV) and drone delivery modes in mountainous terrain. The framework includes a slope-dependent energy consumption model for EVs, a three-dimensional grid-based path planning algorithm for drones accounting for vertical takeoff and landing costs, and optimization models for charging station placement and signal relay tower deployment. Using empirical data from a postal delivery network in mountainous ZhaoDian Township, China, we find that EV delivery is more cost-effective for high-demand, clustered areas, while drone delivery is economically viable for remote, low-demand destinations with limited road access. Demand uncertainty and weather-related flight cancellations reduce the economic viability of drone-only systems. Based on these findings, we derive policy recommendations for establishing a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis framework to evaluate EV and UAV delivery in mountainous regions.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 162
China University of Geosciences (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.