Returning research findings to Sukuma community participants in Tanzania: an Indigenous standpoint–informed approach

Purpose The practice of returning research findings to participants is increasingly recognised as an ethical and relational obligation in educational research. This study explored the experiences of Indigenous participants from Tanzania's Sukuma community when the findings were returned to them. Design/methodology/approach The study was guided by Indigenous Standpoint Theory and employed qualitative data collection methods, including group discussions, interviews and reflective journal entries. Findings The findings demonstrate that the return of research findings is not merely a neutral act of dissemination but rather a community-based knowledge-making process through which participants engage in culturally grounded dialogue to collectively interpret, negotiate and utilise knowledge. This process transforms participants' roles from passive data contributors to active interpreters of knowledge and potential agents of community change, thereby fostering collective reflection, ownership and action. Practical implications The return of findings positions research outputs as community resources rather than academic artefacts. This functions as a form of knowledge mobilisation that challenges extractive research traditions and rebalances the power relations between researchers and participants. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating the return of findings as a community-based knowledge process in the Indigenous Sukuma context. The study redefines the return of findings as not the final stage of research but as an ongoing, culturally grounded process of participatory knowledge production, where participants collaboratively interpret, contextualise and generate new knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Research Journal
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-03-2026-0135
Primary Topic
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Returning research findings to Sukuma community participants in Tanzania: an Indigenous standpoint–informed approach

Hassan Iddy, Daniel Sidney Fussy
Qualitative Research Journal
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
article

Returning research findings to Sukuma community participants in Tanzania: an Indigenous standpoint–informed approach

Hassan Iddy, Daniel Sidney Fussy
article en

Abstract

Purpose The practice of returning research findings to participants is increasingly recognised as an ethical and relational obligation in educational research. This study explored the experiences of Indigenous participants from Tanzania's Sukuma community when the findings were returned to them. Design/methodology/approach The study was guided by Indigenous Standpoint Theory and employed qualitative data collection methods, including group discussions, interviews and reflective journal entries. Findings The findings demonstrate that the return of research findings is not merely a neutral act of dissemination but rather a community-based knowledge-making process through which participants engage in culturally grounded dialogue to collectively interpret, negotiate and utilise knowledge. This process transforms participants' roles from passive data contributors to active interpreters of knowledge and potential agents of community change, thereby fostering collective reflection, ownership and action. Practical implications The return of findings positions research outputs as community resources rather than academic artefacts. This functions as a form of knowledge mobilisation that challenges extractive research traditions and rebalances the power relations between researchers and participants. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by demonstrating the return of findings as a community-based knowledge process in the Indigenous Sukuma context. The study redefines the return of findings as not the final stage of research but as an ongoing, culturally grounded process of participatory knowledge production, where participants collaboratively interpret, contextualise and generate new knowledge.

Qualitative Research Journal
University of Dar es Salaam (TZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.