ReversFix-Technology—A Randomized Clinical Trial Investigating Laser Versus Conventional Removal of Ceramic Veneers and Single Crowns

Objectives: The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study (RCT) was to investigate laser removal of ceramic restorations in terms of its effectiveness and potential advantages compared to conventional methods. Methods: In two study groups, with 20 patients each, veneers (study group V) and single crowns (study group C) made of lithium disilicate were adhesively fixed to vital, asymptomatic teeth. Following a period of wear of 7 ± 2 days, the patients were randomized into either of the two study arms (n = 10). In the control arm, the restorations were removed conventionally with diamond-coated rotary burs in combination with crown removal instruments. In the intervention arm, removal was performed with a pulsed Er:YAG laser (ReversFix-Technology). Results: In group V, all restorations were successfully removed in both study arms, with a significant time advantage observed in the intervention arm (p = 0.002). In group C, all ten restorations were removed conventionally, while in the intervention arm, seven restorations were removed initially and a further two after an additional week of wear; the time required for removal was comparable between the study arms. Using the laser-assisted technique, two veneers and seven crowns could also be removed completely in one piece. Conclusions: ReversFix-Technology can be considered an alternative to conventional methods for removing ceramic restorations. Laser removal even offers a time advantage, particularly for removing veneers. Moreover, in the case of non-destructive removal of the restorations, the option of recementation is possible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj14100666
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ReversFix-Technology—A Randomized Clinical Trial Investigating Laser Versus Conventional Removal of Ceramic Veneers and Single Crowns

Sarah M. Blender, Jens Dreyhaupt, Heike Rudolph, Ralph Gunnar Luthardt
Dentistry Journal
Dental materials and restorations
article

ReversFix-Technology—A Randomized Clinical Trial Investigating Laser Versus Conventional Removal of Ceramic Veneers and Single Crowns

Sarah M. Blender, Jens Dreyhaupt, Heike Rudolph, Ralph Gunnar Luthardt
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study (RCT) was to investigate laser removal of ceramic restorations in terms of its effectiveness and potential advantages compared to conventional methods. Methods: In two study groups, with 20 patients each, veneers (study group V) and single crowns (study group C) made of lithium disilicate were adhesively fixed to vital, asymptomatic teeth. Following a period of wear of 7 ± 2 days, the patients were randomized into either of the two study arms (n = 10). In the control arm, the restorations were removed conventionally with diamond-coated rotary burs in combination with crown removal instruments. In the intervention arm, removal was performed with a pulsed Er:YAG laser (ReversFix-Technology). Results: In group V, all restorations were successfully removed in both study arms, with a significant time advantage observed in the intervention arm (p = 0.002). In group C, all ten restorations were removed conventionally, while in the intervention arm, seven restorations were removed initially and a further two after an additional week of wear; the time required for removal was comparable between the study arms. Using the laser-assisted technique, two veneers and seven crowns could also be removed completely in one piece. Conclusions: ReversFix-Technology can be considered an alternative to conventional methods for removing ceramic restorations. Laser removal even offers a time advantage, particularly for removing veneers. Moreover, in the case of non-destructive removal of the restorations, the option of recementation is possible.

Dentistry JournalVol. 14(10)
Universität Ulm (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.