ARTEMIS enables reusable analytical context generation from scientific literature

Abstract Background Regulatory-science questions often require synthesis across large, heterogeneous, and rapidly evolving scientific literature. In domains such as monoclonal antibody development, the same body of evidence may need to support different analytical goals, including high-level question answering, technology assessment, ethical review, and historical interpretation. Modern large language models (LLMs) can assist with such tasks, but their usefulness depends heavily on the quality and structure of the context provided. This creates a need for approaches that generate reusable analytical contexts from literature rather than relying on direct access to raw documents. Methods We present ARTEMIS (Automated Research & Trend Extraction via Memory-based Insight Synthesis) in a use case focused on monoclonal antibody literature analysis. ARTEMIS transforms a chronological document corpus into reusable analytical contexts through three core capabilities: comprehensive evidence-grounded synthesis across the literature, persona-guided synthesis that supports different perspectives from the same source base, and timeline-aware context generation for historical synthesis and trend interpretation. Results In this case study, ARTEMIS generated reusable analytical contexts that supported multiple forms of literature analysis. As one downstream demonstration, ARTEMIS-based contexts provided a more effective basis for high-level question answering than raw-chunk retrieval, achieving higher answerability (100% vs. 83%) and higher or comparable quality scores in an LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation while using fewer input tokens on average. Beyond Q&A, ARTEMIS supported persona-guided synthesis by producing distinct analyses from the same corpus under three expert personas (a 3Rs Ethical Reviewer, a Clinical Development Risk Strategist, and a NAMs Technology Analyst) and enabled timeline-aware historical synthesis of topic evolution. Conclusion In this case study, ARTEMIS provided useful support for literature-analysis challenges in regulatory science that require grounded question answering, persona-guided synthesis, and historical interpretation from a shared evidence base.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-026-02485-5
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ARTEMIS enables reusable analytical context generation from scientific literature

Joshua Xu, Dan Li, Binsheng Gong, Weida Tong
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Topic Modeling
article

ARTEMIS enables reusable analytical context generation from scientific literature

Joshua Xu, Dan Li, Binsheng Gong, Weida Tong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Regulatory-science questions often require synthesis across large, heterogeneous, and rapidly evolving scientific literature. In domains such as monoclonal antibody development, the same body of evidence may need to support different analytical goals, including high-level question answering, technology assessment, ethical review, and historical interpretation. Modern large language models (LLMs) can assist with such tasks, but their usefulness depends heavily on the quality and structure of the context provided. This creates a need for approaches that generate reusable analytical contexts from literature rather than relying on direct access to raw documents. Methods We present ARTEMIS (Automated Research & Trend Extraction via Memory-based Insight Synthesis) in a use case focused on monoclonal antibody literature analysis. ARTEMIS transforms a chronological document corpus into reusable analytical contexts through three core capabilities: comprehensive evidence-grounded synthesis across the literature, persona-guided synthesis that supports different perspectives from the same source base, and timeline-aware context generation for historical synthesis and trend interpretation. Results In this case study, ARTEMIS generated reusable analytical contexts that supported multiple forms of literature analysis. As one downstream demonstration, ARTEMIS-based contexts provided a more effective basis for high-level question answering than raw-chunk retrieval, achieving higher answerability (100% vs. 83%) and higher or comparable quality scores in an LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation while using fewer input tokens on average. Beyond Q&A, ARTEMIS supported persona-guided synthesis by producing distinct analyses from the same corpus under three expert personas (a 3Rs Ethical Reviewer, a Clinical Development Risk Strategist, and a NAMs Technology Analyst) and enabled timeline-aware historical synthesis of topic evolution. Conclusion In this case study, ARTEMIS provided useful support for literature-analysis challenges in regulatory science that require grounded question answering, persona-guided synthesis, and historical interpretation from a shared evidence base.

Discover Artificial IntelligenceVol. 6(1)
National Center for Toxicological Research (US), United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.