Revised Index–Volumetrics Relationship for Cracking and Its Four Corners

This study aims to improve the reliability of the index–volumetrics relationship (IVR) function used to predict the cracking performance of asphalt mixtures based on field-measurable volumetric parameters. The conventional IVR model, which utilizes in-place voids in mineral aggregate and in-place voids filled with asphalt, has shown inconsistent trends, particularly in the relationship between the cracking index and air void content. To address this limitation, two new parameters were proposed: in-place air void content V a and effective asphalt content P be , based on their independence and linear relationship with cracking performance. Eight mixtures from different states were used to develop and verify the revised IVR function. IVR performance was assessed through calibration using four volumetric conditions (so-called “four corners”) and independent verification. The revised IVR exhibited enhanced consistency and alignment with theoretical expectations. In addition, a random combination analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of different four-corner selections on model behavior. The findings showed that selecting well-distributed calibration points across the V a – P be domain significantly improved the revised model’s prediction accuracy. A new four-corner design is proposed that balances aggregate gradation, design air void content, and performance test air void content. The results of this study contribute to a more robust framework for developing IVRs for balanced mix design and performance-related specifications in asphalt pavement design and construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981261481826
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revised Index–Volumetrics Relationship for Cracking and Its Four Corners

Youngsoo Richard Kim, Dong Ho Yoo
Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Revised Index–Volumetrics Relationship for Cracking and Its Four Corners

Youngsoo Richard Kim, Dong Ho Yoo
article en

Abstract

This study aims to improve the reliability of the index–volumetrics relationship (IVR) function used to predict the cracking performance of asphalt mixtures based on field-measurable volumetric parameters. The conventional IVR model, which utilizes in-place voids in mineral aggregate and in-place voids filled with asphalt, has shown inconsistent trends, particularly in the relationship between the cracking index and air void content. To address this limitation, two new parameters were proposed: in-place air void content V a and effective asphalt content P be , based on their independence and linear relationship with cracking performance. Eight mixtures from different states were used to develop and verify the revised IVR function. IVR performance was assessed through calibration using four volumetric conditions (so-called “four corners”) and independent verification. The revised IVR exhibited enhanced consistency and alignment with theoretical expectations. In addition, a random combination analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of different four-corner selections on model behavior. The findings showed that selecting well-distributed calibration points across the V a – P be domain significantly improved the revised model’s prediction accuracy. A new four-corner design is proposed that balances aggregate gradation, design air void content, and performance test air void content. The results of this study contribute to a more robust framework for developing IVRs for balanced mix design and performance-related specifications in asphalt pavement design and construction.

Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board
North Carolina State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.