Effect of CO2 concentration on carbon sequestration and mechanical strength of coal-based solid waste cemented backfill

Coal production generates large quantities of coal-based solid wastes (coal gangue, blast furnace slag, and fly ash) and significant CO 2 emissions, creating severe ecological challenges in mining regions. This study integrates coal-based solid waste cemented backfilling with CO 2 mineral sequestration to manage both solid wastes and CO 2 . The CO 2 uptake and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of coal-based solid waste cemented backfill (CSCB) were investigated after 14 days of mineralization curing at CO 2 concentrations of 0–10 vol%. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to examine the sequestration mechanism and the associated strength reduction. CO 2 uptake increased with CO 2 concentration: raising the concentration from 1.5 to 10 vol% increased the uptake from 2.42 to 4.05 wt% (a 67.4% increase), based on a single TG measurement per group. In contrast, UCS decreased from 6.05 MPa (0 vol%) to 0.72 MPa (10 vol%), an 88.1% reduction. Microstructural and mineralogical analyses indicate that CO 2 reacts with alkaline phases and hydration products (CH, MH, C-S(A)-H gel, and AFt) to form calcite, gypsum, and possible Mg-bearing carbonate (XRD peaks tentatively assigned to dolomite). The strength loss is attributed to weakening of the alkaline environment, decalcification of C-S(A)-H gel, and carbonation of AFt to gypsum. A concentration of 1.5 vol% provided a reasonable balance, with 2.42 wt% uptake and a 13.2% strength loss. These results show a clear trade-off between carbon uptake and mechanical performance in CSCB.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fuel
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2026.141723
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of CO2 concentration on carbon sequestration and mechanical strength of coal-based solid waste cemented backfill

James J. Sheng, Md Mojahidul Islam, Sobuj Hasan
Fuel
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Effect of CO2 concentration on carbon sequestration and mechanical strength of coal-based solid waste cemented backfill

James J. Sheng, Md Mojahidul Islam, Sobuj Hasan
article en

Abstract

Coal production generates large quantities of coal-based solid wastes (coal gangue, blast furnace slag, and fly ash) and significant CO 2 emissions, creating severe ecological challenges in mining regions. This study integrates coal-based solid waste cemented backfilling with CO 2 mineral sequestration to manage both solid wastes and CO 2 . The CO 2 uptake and uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of coal-based solid waste cemented backfill (CSCB) were investigated after 14 days of mineralization curing at CO 2 concentrations of 0–10 vol%. Thermogravimetric analysis (TG), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to examine the sequestration mechanism and the associated strength reduction. CO 2 uptake increased with CO 2 concentration: raising the concentration from 1.5 to 10 vol% increased the uptake from 2.42 to 4.05 wt% (a 67.4% increase), based on a single TG measurement per group. In contrast, UCS decreased from 6.05 MPa (0 vol%) to 0.72 MPa (10 vol%), an 88.1% reduction. Microstructural and mineralogical analyses indicate that CO 2 reacts with alkaline phases and hydration products (CH, MH, C-S(A)-H gel, and AFt) to form calcite, gypsum, and possible Mg-bearing carbonate (XRD peaks tentatively assigned to dolomite). The strength loss is attributed to weakening of the alkaline environment, decalcification of C-S(A)-H gel, and carbonation of AFt to gypsum. A concentration of 1.5 vol% provided a reasonable balance, with 2.42 wt% uptake and a 13.2% strength loss. These results show a clear trade-off between carbon uptake and mechanical performance in CSCB.

FuelVol. 430
Texas Tech University (US), China University of Mining and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.