Remembering precarious statehood: Public recall of Georgia’s modern past

Modern Georgian history has been marked by war, territorial loss, sovereignty struggles, and political rupture, and these experiences shape which events become publicly salient. Drawing on a nationally representative face-to-face survey conducted in 2015, we analyze responses to two open-ended questions asking respondents to name the most important events since the beginning of the 20th century. The findings indicate that recall is focused on a relatively limited set of events, structured by a precarious statehood framework, and is marked by significant uncertainty and nonresponse. The most salient nominations are largely drawn from the post-Soviet period, although World War II remains a notable exception. Event recall is structured by cohort and internal displacement and further patterned by education, settlement context, and the national identity factor score. These results show how event salience reflects socially patterned access to historically available narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory Studies
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980261488764
Primary Topic
Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remembering precarious statehood: Public recall of Georgia’s modern past

Peter Kabachnik, Alexi Gugushvili
Memory Studies
Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
article

Remembering precarious statehood: Public recall of Georgia’s modern past

Peter Kabachnik, Alexi Gugushvili
article en

Abstract

Modern Georgian history has been marked by war, territorial loss, sovereignty struggles, and political rupture, and these experiences shape which events become publicly salient. Drawing on a nationally representative face-to-face survey conducted in 2015, we analyze responses to two open-ended questions asking respondents to name the most important events since the beginning of the 20th century. The findings indicate that recall is focused on a relatively limited set of events, structured by a precarious statehood framework, and is marked by significant uncertainty and nonresponse. The most salient nominations are largely drawn from the post-Soviet period, although World War II remains a notable exception. Event recall is structured by cohort and internal displacement and further patterned by education, settlement context, and the national identity factor score. These results show how event salience reflects socially patterned access to historically available narratives.

Memory Studies
City University of New York (US), University of Oslo (NO)
Norges Forskningsråd
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.