Rethinking the EU’s Strategic Shift: A Critical Review of the Literature

This essay reviews a decade of literature on the EU strategic shift, encompassing efforts to forge a common vision of strategic autonomy, to integrate the European defence industry, and increase military spending. Mainstream approaches grounded in integration theory and IR are shaped by ontological assumptions that constrain the treatment of relevant actors, preference formation, and the relationship between economic and security dynamics. Combined with disciplinary entrenchment, these assumptions yield theoretically partial and often empirically underdeveloped accounts of the shift and may contribute to the legitimisation of a significant process of rearmament. This review argues that international political economy (IPE) frameworks are better suited to examining how global geopolitical and geoeconomic transformations interact with European security and industrial restructuring, including how security priorities reshape industrial policy while industrial interests and structures influence strategic priorities. It further advocates critical interdisciplinary research on European rearmament, drawing on historical materialist IPE to examine how this economy-security relationship is historically constituted and sustained through particular configurations of social forces, institutions, and material interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alternatives Global Local Political
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754261498325
Primary Topic
European Politics and Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking the EU’s Strategic Shift: A Critical Review of the Literature

Faidon Zaras
Alternatives Global Local Political
European Politics and Security
article

Rethinking the EU’s Strategic Shift: A Critical Review of the Literature

Faidon Zaras
article en

Abstract

This essay reviews a decade of literature on the EU strategic shift, encompassing efforts to forge a common vision of strategic autonomy, to integrate the European defence industry, and increase military spending. Mainstream approaches grounded in integration theory and IR are shaped by ontological assumptions that constrain the treatment of relevant actors, preference formation, and the relationship between economic and security dynamics. Combined with disciplinary entrenchment, these assumptions yield theoretically partial and often empirically underdeveloped accounts of the shift and may contribute to the legitimisation of a significant process of rearmament. This review argues that international political economy (IPE) frameworks are better suited to examining how global geopolitical and geoeconomic transformations interact with European security and industrial restructuring, including how security priorities reshape industrial policy while industrial interests and structures influence strategic priorities. It further advocates critical interdisciplinary research on European rearmament, drawing on historical materialist IPE to examine how this economy-security relationship is historically constituted and sustained through particular configurations of social forces, institutions, and material interests.

Alternatives Global Local Political
School of Visual Arts (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
European Politics and Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.