“Single-Centre Audit of Bone-Modifying Agents in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Bone Metastases”

Bone metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasms are uncommon but cause significant morbidity. A recent Italian survey of 320 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and bone metastases reported skeletal-related events in 23% and bone-targeted agent use in 31%, highlighting limited evidence for bone-modifying agents. We identified adults with confirmed or clinically suspected neuroendocrine bone involvement who received a bone-modifying agent at a UK tertiary centre (January 2019-September 2024), using institutional prescribing records. Demographic, tumour, treatment, and toxicity data were extracted from records. Twenty-two patients received treatment (denosumab 17 [77%], zoledronic acid 5 [23%]). Most (91%) had grade 1-2 tumours; 64% had gastro-entero-pancreatic primaries. Bone metastases were synchronous in 46% and widespread (more than three lesions) in 73%. At diagnosis, 22% were symptomatic; during follow-up, 78% developed pain, high blood calcium, or a skeletal-related event. Skeletal-related events, a composite of pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiotherapy to bone, or orthopaedic surgery, occurred in 41% (radiotherapy alone in 36%); pain-relieving medication was used universally. Treatment was mainly given every 12 weeks (median six doses). Low blood calcium occurred in 9% and osteonecrosis of the jaw in 5%; dental assessment before therapy was recorded in only 9%. These figures are broadly consistent with the Italian survey cited above. Treatment use was heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of disease-specific guidelines, and toxicity was comparable to other solid tumours and generally manageable. Our findings highlight the need for prospective studies and structured registries to clarify treatment use, dosing, and impact on quality of life and prognosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endocrine Connections
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1530/ec-26-0252
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Single-Centre Audit of Bone-Modifying Agents in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Bone Metastases”

Tami Grunewald, Florian Wernig, Antonio D’Alessio, Preetha Aravind et al.
Endocrine Connections
Bone health and treatments
article

“Single-Centre Audit of Bone-Modifying Agents in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Bone Metastases”

Tami Grunewald, Florian Wernig, Antonio D’Alessio, Preetha Aravind, Hemanth Prabhudev, Wessam Osman, Rohini Sharma, Ramona Nistor, Jeannie Todd
article en

Abstract

Bone metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasms are uncommon but cause significant morbidity. A recent Italian survey of 320 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and bone metastases reported skeletal-related events in 23% and bone-targeted agent use in 31%, highlighting limited evidence for bone-modifying agents. We identified adults with confirmed or clinically suspected neuroendocrine bone involvement who received a bone-modifying agent at a UK tertiary centre (January 2019-September 2024), using institutional prescribing records. Demographic, tumour, treatment, and toxicity data were extracted from records. Twenty-two patients received treatment (denosumab 17 [77%], zoledronic acid 5 [23%]). Most (91%) had grade 1-2 tumours; 64% had gastro-entero-pancreatic primaries. Bone metastases were synchronous in 46% and widespread (more than three lesions) in 73%. At diagnosis, 22% were symptomatic; during follow-up, 78% developed pain, high blood calcium, or a skeletal-related event. Skeletal-related events, a composite of pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiotherapy to bone, or orthopaedic surgery, occurred in 41% (radiotherapy alone in 36%); pain-relieving medication was used universally. Treatment was mainly given every 12 weeks (median six doses). Low blood calcium occurred in 9% and osteonecrosis of the jaw in 5%; dental assessment before therapy was recorded in only 9%. These figures are broadly consistent with the Italian survey cited above. Treatment use was heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of disease-specific guidelines, and toxicity was comparable to other solid tumours and generally manageable. Our findings highlight the need for prospective studies and structured registries to clarify treatment use, dosing, and impact on quality of life and prognosis.

Endocrine Connections
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Imperial College London Diabetes Centre (AE), Imperial College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.