Research on health information quality evaluation indicators for mobile social media based on user perception

Unreliable health information on social media negatively impacts public health decisions. The prevalence of health-related content on mobile social media platforms has elevated information quality to a critical public health concern. However, the peculiarities of social media are not taken into consideration by conventional methods and criteria used to evaluate health-related content in the public domain. This study try to examining what consumers value and expect from the quality of health information on mobile social media, and build a model for evaluating the quality of health information on these platforms. We have identified a list of health information quality indicators for mobile social media from existing tools and literature, and based on this, designed a questionnaire survey for mobile social media users. The importance of the indicators was ranked based on user suggestion, and hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify the dimensions of indicator classification. Based on clustering analysis and professional practice, we propose organizing mobile social media health information quality indicators into five dimensions, include relevance, timeliness, credibility, and professional value of health information content. Subgroup analysis shows no statistical difference in authentication, objectivity, author transparency, reference source, and readability due to demographics. Users from different groups have consistent recognition of the importance of evaluation indicators such as navigation, personalized recommendation, content relevance, no advertising, content focus, and universality of health programs. However, there are significant differences in multimedia richness among different user groups for evaluation indicators. We have identified evaluation indicators for the quality of health information on mobile social media and organized them by dimension. There are partial differences in the perception of evaluation indicators among different user groups. Therefore, the optimization of health information quality in the future can be carried out targeted to different user groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-29799-4
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on health information quality evaluation indicators for mobile social media based on user perception

Xiaoyu Zhao, Qian Xu, DeHua Hu, Linyong Xu et al.
BMC Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Research on health information quality evaluation indicators for mobile social media based on user perception

Xiaoyu Zhao, Qian Xu, DeHua Hu, Linyong Xu, Luo Aijing, Pingping Dai, Zirui Xin, Yangbo Nie, Zhao Pan, Pan Dai
article en

Abstract

Unreliable health information on social media negatively impacts public health decisions. The prevalence of health-related content on mobile social media platforms has elevated information quality to a critical public health concern. However, the peculiarities of social media are not taken into consideration by conventional methods and criteria used to evaluate health-related content in the public domain. This study try to examining what consumers value and expect from the quality of health information on mobile social media, and build a model for evaluating the quality of health information on these platforms. We have identified a list of health information quality indicators for mobile social media from existing tools and literature, and based on this, designed a questionnaire survey for mobile social media users. The importance of the indicators was ranked based on user suggestion, and hierarchical clustering analysis was used to identify the dimensions of indicator classification. Based on clustering analysis and professional practice, we propose organizing mobile social media health information quality indicators into five dimensions, include relevance, timeliness, credibility, and professional value of health information content. Subgroup analysis shows no statistical difference in authentication, objectivity, author transparency, reference source, and readability due to demographics. Users from different groups have consistent recognition of the importance of evaluation indicators such as navigation, personalized recommendation, content relevance, no advertising, content focus, and universality of health programs. However, there are significant differences in multimedia richness among different user groups for evaluation indicators. We have identified evaluation indicators for the quality of health information on mobile social media and organized them by dimension. There are partial differences in the perception of evaluation indicators among different user groups. Therefore, the optimization of health information quality in the future can be carried out targeted to different user groups.

BMC Public Health
Central South University (CN), Third Xiangya Hospital (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.