Impact of UAV flight parameters and acquisition context for canopy height and trunk diameter measurement using LiDAR

Abstract Key message Drone-borne LiDAR can measure forest structure quickly and accurately. In a poplar plantation, tree height was retrieved reliably under almost any flight setting, whereas trunk diameter proved far more demanding: accurate values required flying in winter (leafless trees), at low altitude, with triple returns and generous plot margins, and along the planting rows. These practical guidelines make drone-based forest monitoring more reliable and reproducible. Context Accurate tree height and trunk diameter measurements underpin forest inventory, biomass estimation, and sustainable management. UAV-borne LiDAR is a promising tool for tree-level inventory, yet how flight parameters and acquisition context affect the accuracy of derived structural metrics remains insufficiently documented. Aims We quantified how UAV flight altitude, speed, plot margins, number of returns, flight plan geometry, and seasonal conditions influence canopy height and trunk diameter estimation. Methods Twenty-two UAV flights were conducted over a managed 0.23-ha poplar plantation in southwestern France (2024–2025) using a DJI Matrice 300 with a Zenmuse L1 sensor and different varied parameters. Tree-level metrics were compared with field measurements, terrestrial and airborne LiDAR, and satellite-derived canopy height maps. Results Canopy height was retrieved robustly (best RMSE = 0.33 m, best R 2 = 0.99 versus terrestrial LiDAR), requiring roughly 1000 pts·m⁻ 2 and altitudes below 60 m above the canopy. Trunk diameter was far more sensitive: accurate retrieval (best RMSE = 3.2 cm; best R 2 = 0.90) required leaf-off conditions, low altitude, triple returns, generous margins, and flight lines aligned with planting rows. Conclusion UAV LiDAR can replace labor-intensive field measurements for canopy height under almost any flight setting, but reliable trunk diameter requires leaf-off, low-altitude flights aligned with planting rows; notably, generous plot margins allow flying higher and faster without loss of accuracy, reducing acquisition time and data volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Forest Science
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13595-026-01371-5
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of UAV flight parameters and acquisition context for canopy height and trunk diameter measurement using LiDAR

Martin Schwartz, Frédéric Frappart, Clément BATTISTA, Frédéric Baup
Annals of Forest Science
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
article

Impact of UAV flight parameters and acquisition context for canopy height and trunk diameter measurement using LiDAR

Martin Schwartz, Frédéric Frappart, Clément BATTISTA, Frédéric Baup
article en

Abstract

Abstract Key message Drone-borne LiDAR can measure forest structure quickly and accurately. In a poplar plantation, tree height was retrieved reliably under almost any flight setting, whereas trunk diameter proved far more demanding: accurate values required flying in winter (leafless trees), at low altitude, with triple returns and generous plot margins, and along the planting rows. These practical guidelines make drone-based forest monitoring more reliable and reproducible. Context Accurate tree height and trunk diameter measurements underpin forest inventory, biomass estimation, and sustainable management. UAV-borne LiDAR is a promising tool for tree-level inventory, yet how flight parameters and acquisition context affect the accuracy of derived structural metrics remains insufficiently documented. Aims We quantified how UAV flight altitude, speed, plot margins, number of returns, flight plan geometry, and seasonal conditions influence canopy height and trunk diameter estimation. Methods Twenty-two UAV flights were conducted over a managed 0.23-ha poplar plantation in southwestern France (2024–2025) using a DJI Matrice 300 with a Zenmuse L1 sensor and different varied parameters. Tree-level metrics were compared with field measurements, terrestrial and airborne LiDAR, and satellite-derived canopy height maps. Results Canopy height was retrieved robustly (best RMSE = 0.33 m, best R 2 = 0.99 versus terrestrial LiDAR), requiring roughly 1000 pts·m⁻ 2 and altitudes below 60 m above the canopy. Trunk diameter was far more sensitive: accurate retrieval (best RMSE = 3.2 cm; best R 2 = 0.90) required leaf-off conditions, low altitude, triple returns, generous margins, and flight lines aligned with planting rows. Conclusion UAV LiDAR can replace labor-intensive field measurements for canopy height under almost any flight setting, but reliable trunk diameter requires leaf-off, low-altitude flights aligned with planting rows; notably, generous plot margins allow flying higher and faster without loss of accuracy, reducing acquisition time and data volume.

Annals of Forest ScienceVol. 83(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Biologie du Fruit et Pathologie (FR), Santé et Agroécologie du Vignoble (FR), Centre d'Études Spatiales de la Biosphère (FR), CEA Paris-Saclay (FR), Unité mixte de recherche Œnologie (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.