Filtering Out vs. Looking Away? Proactive and Reactive Online Information Avoidance in the Face of Health Misinformation

Online information avoidance (OIA) has become a prominent issue, yet scholarship often treats it as a monolithic construct, overlooking the distinction between proactive (e.g., blocking) and reactive (e.g., scrolling past) behaviors. This study examined the causal impact of misinformation exposure on these two distinct avoidance strategies and investigated the moderating role of information-verifying efficacy (IVE). Through an online experiment (N = 310) utilizing a (misinformation exposure: misinformative vs. factual) between-subjects design, we found that IVE served as a critical buffer. Crucially, the interaction between misinformation exposure and IVE was significant only for proactive OIA: high-IVE individuals showed reduced proactive avoidance when exposed to misinformation, whereas this buffering effect was absent for reactive OIA. Moreover, message credibility was identified as a key mediator in this dynamic. These findings suggest the importance of distinguishing avoidance types and highlight that IVE empowers users to curate, rather than disconnect from, their information environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2744879
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Filtering Out vs. Looking Away? Proactive and Reactive Online Information Avoidance in the Face of Health Misinformation

Meng Chen, Laramie D. Taylor, Ke Liu
Health Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Filtering Out vs. Looking Away? Proactive and Reactive Online Information Avoidance in the Face of Health Misinformation

Meng Chen, Laramie D. Taylor, Ke Liu
article en

Abstract

Online information avoidance (OIA) has become a prominent issue, yet scholarship often treats it as a monolithic construct, overlooking the distinction between proactive (e.g., blocking) and reactive (e.g., scrolling past) behaviors. This study examined the causal impact of misinformation exposure on these two distinct avoidance strategies and investigated the moderating role of information-verifying efficacy (IVE). Through an online experiment (N = 310) utilizing a (misinformation exposure: misinformative vs. factual) between-subjects design, we found that IVE served as a critical buffer. Crucially, the interaction between misinformation exposure and IVE was significant only for proactive OIA: high-IVE individuals showed reduced proactive avoidance when exposed to misinformation, whereas this buffering effect was absent for reactive OIA. Moreover, message credibility was identified as a key mediator in this dynamic. These findings suggest the importance of distinguishing avoidance types and highlight that IVE empowers users to curate, rather than disconnect from, their information environments.

Health Communication
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.