Structural design of microfluidic fuel cells: A review

Microfluidic fuel cells (MFCs) exploit microscale laminar flow to control reactant delivery and, in many membraneless configurations, maintain fuel-oxidant separation without a conventional ion-exchange membrane. Their compact, membrane-free architecture makes them attractive for portable and integrated power sources, yet performance remains highly sensitive to channel geometry, electrode arrangement, flow distribution, and interfacial transport. Existing reviews have largely addressed device categories or individual optimization strategies in isolation, leaving the links between structural design, transport phenomena, and engineering trade-offs insufficiently resolved. This review reassesses co-flow, counter-flow, single-flow, triple-flow, vapor-feed, and passive MFCs within a unified structure-transport-performance framework, focusing on depletion boundary-layer development, reactant crossover, mixed-potential losses, bubble-induced blockage, hydrodynamic resistance, and current-density nonuniformity. Channel and electrode designs are compared according to their ability to replenish reactants, stabilize the liquid-liquid interface, promote bubble discharge, and alleviate concentration polarization, along with associated penalties such as pressure drop, reduced fuel utilization, and fabrication complexity. Stack architectures are further evaluated in terms of flow maldistribution, shunt currents, and cell-to-cell variation. Beyond cell-level performance, application scenarios, manufacturing reproducibility, durability, cost, and commercialization barriers are discussed. Future progress will rely on validated multiphase modeling, additive manufacturing, physics-informed AI, and standardized testing protocols. Structural optimization should therefore be treated as a multi-objective design problem rather than a pursuit of maximum power density alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2026.117605
Primary Topic
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural design of microfluidic fuel cells: A review

Qiao Lan, Jian Liu, Shuhan Zhang, Yuchen Xu
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
article

Structural design of microfluidic fuel cells: A review

Qiao Lan, Jian Liu, Shuhan Zhang, Yuchen Xu
article en

Abstract

Microfluidic fuel cells (MFCs) exploit microscale laminar flow to control reactant delivery and, in many membraneless configurations, maintain fuel-oxidant separation without a conventional ion-exchange membrane. Their compact, membrane-free architecture makes them attractive for portable and integrated power sources, yet performance remains highly sensitive to channel geometry, electrode arrangement, flow distribution, and interfacial transport. Existing reviews have largely addressed device categories or individual optimization strategies in isolation, leaving the links between structural design, transport phenomena, and engineering trade-offs insufficiently resolved. This review reassesses co-flow, counter-flow, single-flow, triple-flow, vapor-feed, and passive MFCs within a unified structure-transport-performance framework, focusing on depletion boundary-layer development, reactant crossover, mixed-potential losses, bubble-induced blockage, hydrodynamic resistance, and current-density nonuniformity. Channel and electrode designs are compared according to their ability to replenish reactants, stabilize the liquid-liquid interface, promote bubble discharge, and alleviate concentration polarization, along with associated penalties such as pressure drop, reduced fuel utilization, and fabrication complexity. Stack architectures are further evaluated in terms of flow maldistribution, shunt currents, and cell-to-cell variation. Beyond cell-level performance, application scenarios, manufacturing reproducibility, durability, cost, and commercialization barriers are discussed. Future progress will rely on validated multiphase modeling, additive manufacturing, physics-informed AI, and standardized testing protocols. Structural optimization should therefore be treated as a multi-objective design problem rather than a pursuit of maximum power density alone.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 244
Lanzhou University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Fuel Cells and Related Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.