Watch now or never: fear of a better option (FoBO), maximizing tendencies, and decision-making on video streaming services

Purpose This study aims to investigate how affective experiences associated with Fear of a Better Option (FoBO) and Maximizing Tendencies (MT) are reflected in consumer decision-making in Subscription Video-on-Demand (SVOD) environments. Specifically, it investigates how choice overload and social comparison relate to maximizing behavior and how these processes contribute to decision avoidance and post-decision regret. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design was employed. Study 1 uses survey data from 205 SVOD users and partial least squares structural equation modeling to examine relationships among choice overload, social comparison, recommendation system strategy, maximizing tendencies, decision avoidance/paralysis and post-decision regret. Study 2 comprises 20 in-depth interviews exploring consumers’ experiences during content selection, providing qualitative evidence that participants’ descriptions of affective experiences are conceptually consistent with FoBO and their relationship to maximizing behavior. Findings Choice overload and social comparison were associated with maximizing tendencies, which in turn were associated with decision avoidance/paralysis and post-decision regret. The recommendation system strategy was positively associated with maximizing tendencies but did not mitigate their effects on decision outcomes. Qualitative findings suggest participants described concern about overlooking better alternatives before making a decision and extensive search and comparison as responses, complementing the quantitative results by showing how affective experiences and cognitive-behavioral processes jointly shape decision-making in SVOD environments. Practical implications The results highlight the need for SVOD services to tailor decision-support features to different decision-making styles and to develop strategies that reduce choice anxieties. Originality/value By integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence, it advances understanding of decision anxiety in high-choice digital environments and clarifies the FoBO affective experience and MT cognitive-behavioral orientation relationship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-01-2026-8834
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Watch now or never: fear of a better option (FoBO), maximizing tendencies, and decision-making on video streaming services

Pedro Miguel Oliveira, Paulo Rita, Marlon Dalmoro, Mariana Sousa
Journal of Consumer Marketing
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Watch now or never: fear of a better option (FoBO), maximizing tendencies, and decision-making on video streaming services

Pedro Miguel Oliveira, Paulo Rita, Marlon Dalmoro, Mariana Sousa
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate how affective experiences associated with Fear of a Better Option (FoBO) and Maximizing Tendencies (MT) are reflected in consumer decision-making in Subscription Video-on-Demand (SVOD) environments. Specifically, it investigates how choice overload and social comparison relate to maximizing behavior and how these processes contribute to decision avoidance and post-decision regret. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-methods design was employed. Study 1 uses survey data from 205 SVOD users and partial least squares structural equation modeling to examine relationships among choice overload, social comparison, recommendation system strategy, maximizing tendencies, decision avoidance/paralysis and post-decision regret. Study 2 comprises 20 in-depth interviews exploring consumers’ experiences during content selection, providing qualitative evidence that participants’ descriptions of affective experiences are conceptually consistent with FoBO and their relationship to maximizing behavior. Findings Choice overload and social comparison were associated with maximizing tendencies, which in turn were associated with decision avoidance/paralysis and post-decision regret. The recommendation system strategy was positively associated with maximizing tendencies but did not mitigate their effects on decision outcomes. Qualitative findings suggest participants described concern about overlooking better alternatives before making a decision and extensive search and comparison as responses, complementing the quantitative results by showing how affective experiences and cognitive-behavioral processes jointly shape decision-making in SVOD environments. Practical implications The results highlight the need for SVOD services to tailor decision-support features to different decision-making styles and to develop strategies that reduce choice anxieties. Originality/value By integrating quantitative and qualitative evidence, it advances understanding of decision anxiety in high-choice digital environments and clarifies the FoBO affective experience and MT cognitive-behavioral orientation relationship.

Journal of Consumer Marketing
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), Instituto Português de Administração de Marketing (PT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.